Article history: Received: 15-11-2016, Accepted: 23-03-2017, Published online: 04-05-2017
Corresponding author: Kishorkumar D. Aparnathi
E-mail: email@example.comCitation: Prajapati DB, Kapadiya DB, Jain AK, Mehta BM, Darji VB, Aparnathi KD (2017) Comparison of Surti goat milk with cow and buffalo milk for physicochemical characteristics, selected processing-related parameters and activity of selected enzymes, Veterinary World, 10(5): 477-484.
Aim: The study was undertaken to find out the physicochemical characteristics, selected processing-related parameters and activity of selected enzymes in Surti goat milk.
Materials and Methods: Milk samples from Surti goats and buffalo milk samples were collected during the period from July 2013 to January 2014 at Reproductive Biology Research Unit, Anand Agricultural University (AAU), Anand. Milk samples from Kankrej cows were collected from Livestock Research Station, AAU, Anand. Samples were analyzed for physicochemical characteristics such as acidity, viscosity, surface tension, specific gravity, refractive index, freezing point, and electrical conductivity. Samples were also analyzed for selected processing-related parameters such as heat coagulation time (HCT), rennet coagulation time (RCT), rate of acid production by starter culture, alcohol stability, and activity of selected enzymes such as alkaline phosphatase activity, catalase activity, proteolytic activity, and lipase activity.
Results: Goat milk had the highest acidity, viscosity and surface tension, followed by cow milk and buffalo milk. However, the differences in acidity, specific gravity, surface tension, refractive index, electrical conductivity, HCT and lipase activity of three types of milk studied, viz., goat, cow, and buffalo milk were found statistically non-significant (p<0.05). The buffalo milk had the highest specific gravity, followed by those found in cow and goat milk. The viscosity, freezing point and RCT of goat milk was significantly lower (p>0.05) than that of the buffalo milk. However, the difference in viscosity, freezing point and RCT of goat milk and that of the cow milk was statistically non-significant. The cow milk had the highest refractive index, followed by goat and buffalo milk. The cow milk had the highest proteolytic activity and heat coagulation time (HCT), followed by those found in buffalo and goat milk. The goat milk had the lowest freezing point, lipase activity, and RCT, followed by those found in cow and buffalo milk. The goat milk had the highest electrical conductivity, followed by those found in buffalo and cow milk. The collected goat, cow and buffalo milk samples showed negative stability at 68% (v/v) alcohol concentration. Goat milk showed positive alcohol test at 75% (v/v) alcohol concentration. Acidity was found to increase proportionally with time. After 14 h, it was found that goat milk became thicker, but the curd had a very low consistency. Cow milk had the highest alkaline phosphatase activity and catalase activity followed by those found in goat milk and lowest alkaline phosphatase activity and catalase activity was found in buffalo milk. The alkaline phosphatase activity and proteolytic activity of goat milk was significantly lower (p>0.05) than that of the cow milk. However, the difference in alkaline phosphatase activity and proteolytic activity of goat milk and that of the buffalo milk was statistically non-significant. Alkaline phosphatase activity of buffalo milk was significantly lower (p>0.05) than that of the alkaline phosphatase activity in cow milk.
Conclusion: It can be concluded from the study that the goat milk has highest acidity, viscosity, electrical conductivity, and surface tension compared to that of cow and buffalo milk. The goat milk has lowest specific gravity, freezing point, proteolytic activity, lipase activity, RCT and HCT compared to cow and buffalo milk. Goat milk had highest refractive index compared to buffalo milk, whereas lowest refractive index compared to cow milk. Goat milk showed positive alcohol test at 75% (v/v) alcohol concentration. The curd formed from goat milk after 14 h was having very weak consistency. The goat milk has higher alkaline phosphatase activity, catalase activity compared to buffalo milk while it has lower alkaline phosphatase activity, catalase activity compared to cow milk.
Keywords: heat coagulation time, lipase activity, physicochemical characteristics, proteolytic activity, rennet coagulation time.
1. Mourad, G., Bettache, G. and Samir, M. (2014) Composition and nutritional value of raw milk. Bio. Sci. Pharm. Res., 2(10): 115-122.
2. Kedzierska-Matysek, M., Barlowska, J., Litwinczuk, Z. and Koperska, N. (2013) Content of macro and microelements in goat milk in relation to the lactation stage and region of production. J. Elem. S., 18: 107-114.
3. Mayer, H.K. and Fiechter, G. (2012) Physicochemical characteristics of goat's milk in Austria seasonal variations and differences between six breeds. Dairy Sci. Technol., 92(2): 167-177. [Crossref]
4. Never, A. (2015) Effects of nutrition on yield and milk composition in sheep and goats. Sci. J. Anim. Sci., 4(1): 1-10.
5. Ulusoy, B.H. (2015) Nutritional and health aspects of goat milk consumption. Akademik Gida, 13(1): 56-60.
6. Yangilar, F. (2013) As a potentially functional food: Goats' milk and products. J. Food Nutr. Sci., 1(4): 68-81.
7. Babayan, V.K. (1981) Medium chain length fatty acid esters and their medical and nutritional application. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc., 59: 49-51. [Crossref]
8. Tilahun, Z., Nejash, A., Tadele, K. and Girma, K. (2014) Review on medicinal and nutritional values of goat milk. Acad. J. Nutri., 3(3): 30-39.
9. Sindhu, J.S. and Singhal, O.P. (1988) Qualitative Aspects of Buffalo Milk Constituents for Product Technology. Vol. 2. Proceeding 2nd World Buffalo Congress. I.C.A.R., New Delhi. p263-287.
10. Arora, R., Bhojak, N. and Joshi, R. (2013) Comparative aspects of goat and cow milk. Int. J. Eng. Sci. Invent., 2(1): 7-10.
11. Assan, N. (2014) Influence of stage of lactation on quantitative and qualitative milk production parameters in goats. Sci. J. Anim. Sci., 3(12): 291-300.
12. Farina, G., Cattaneo, D., Lecchi, C., Invernizzi, G. and Savoini, G. (2015) A review on the role of EPA and DHA through goat nutrition to human health: Could they be effective both to animals and humans? J. Dairy Vet. Anim. Res., 2(2): 27-31.
13. Jung, T., Yun, S., Lee, W., Kim, J., Ha, H., Yoo, M., Hwang, H., Jeon, W. and Han, K. (2016) Hydrolysis by alcalase improves hypoallergenic properties of goat milk protein. Korean J. Food Sci. Anim., 36(4): 516-522. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
14. Bihar Basic Animal Husbandry Statistics. (2012) State/UT Animal Husbandry Departments. Government of Bihar Department of Animal & Fisheries Resources, Bihar, Patna.
15. Koletzko, S., Niggemann, B., Arato, A., Dias, J.A., Heuschkel, R., Husby, S., Mearin, M.L., Papadopoulou, A., Ruemmele, F.M., Staiano, A., Schappi, M.G. and Vandenplas, Y. (2012) Diagnostic approach and management of cow's-milk protein allergy in infants and children: ESPGHAN GI committee practical guidelines. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr., 55(2): 221-229. [Crossref] [PubMed]
17. BIS Handbook. (1981) SP: 18 (Part. I). ISI Handbook of Food Analysis. Part. XI. Dairy Products. Indian Standards Institution, New Delhi.
18. Muir, D.D. and Sweetsur, A.W.M. (1978) Heat stability of goat milk. Proceedings of the 20th International Dairy Congress, Paris. p. 252-272.
19. Gallager, D.P. and Mulvihill, D.M. (1997) Heat stability and renneting characteristics of milk systems containing bovine casein micelles and porcine or bovine β-lactoglobulin. Int. Dairy J., 7: 221-227. [Crossref]
20. Ahmad, S.I., Gaucher, F., Rousseau, E., Beaucher, M., Piot, J.F. and Gaucheron, F. (2008) Effects of acidification on physicochemical characteristics of buffalo milk: A comparison with cow's milk. Food Chem., 106: 11-21. [Crossref]
21. Sharma, P. (1972) Enzymes of milk and butter. Int. J. Biochem., 3(17): 543-546.
22. Karmakar, U., Datta, B., Patra, P.B. and Mandal, T.K. (2011) Disposition kinetics of ceftizoxime in healthy and mastitic goats after intravenous administration. Pharmacol. Online, 3: 935-946.
23. Kumar, S., Kumar, B., Kumar, R., Khatkar, S.K. and Kanawjia, S.K. (2012) Nutritional features of goat milk: Review. National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal (Haryana). J. Dairy Sci., 65(4): 266-272.
24. Gamble, J.A., Ellis, N.R. and Besley, A.K. (1939) Composition and Properties of Goat Milk as Compared with Cow's Milk. United State Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.
25. Rudolf, J.F., Donna, M. and William, J.W. (2010) Statistical Methods. 3rd ed. Elsevier Inc., UK.
26. Mahmood, A. and Usman, S. (2010) A comparative study on the physicochemical parameters of milk samples collected from buffalo, cow, goat and sheep of Gujrat, Pakistan. Pak. J. Nutr., 9(12): 1192-1197. [Crossref]
27. Aneja, R.P., Mathur, B.N., Chandan, R.C. and Banerjee, A.K. (2002) Technology of Indian Milk Products. Dairy India Yearbook Publishers, New Delhi. p301-304.
28. Hanl, X., Lee, F.L., Zhang, L. and Guo, M.R. (2012) Chemical composition of water buffalo milk and its low-fat symbiotic yogurt development. Funct. Foods Health Dis., 2(4): 86-106.
29. Park, Y.W., Juarez, M., Ramos, M. and Haenlein, G.F.W. (2007) Physico-chemical characteristics of goat and sheep milk. Small Rumin. Res., 68: 88-113. [Crossref]
30. Imran, M., Khan, H., Hassan, S.S. and Khan, R. (2008) Physicochemical characteristics of various milk samples available in Pakistan. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B, 9(7): 546-551. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
31. Laxminarayana, H. and Dastur, N.N. (1968) Buffalo milk and milk products, part II. Dairy Sci. Abstr., 30: 177-186.
32. Sindhu, J.S. (1998) Chemical aspects of cow and buffalo milk in relation to quality of traditional dairy products. In: Compendium: Advances in Traditional dairy Products. Centre for Advanced Studies in Dairy Technology, NDRI, Karnal. p12-16.
33. Muhammad, F., Awais, M.M., Akhtar, M. and Anwar, M.I. (2013) Quantitative structure activity relationship and risk analysis of some pesticides in the goat milk. Iran. J. Environ. Health Sci. Engineer., 10: 4-12. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
34. Drackova, M., Hadra, L., Janstova, B., Navratilova, P., Pridalova, H. and Vorlova, L. (2008) Analysis of goat milk by near-infrared spectroscopy. Acta Vet. Brno.,77: 415-420. [Crossref]
35. Kentaro, M. (1937) Studies on the alcohol coagulation of fresh cow milk. J. Fac. Agric. Hokkaido Imp. Univ. Sapporo., 12: 2-6.
36. Kakar, M.U.H., Kakar, M.A., Shahwani, M.N., Ahmed, N., Arain, M.A. and Khaskhaili, M. (2013) Stabilization of fresh buffalo milk by activating lactoperoxidase system. J. Anim. Plant Sci., 23: 90-95.
37. Palanidorai, R., Akila, N. and Kumar, T.S. (2009) Goat milk dahi. Tamil. J. Vet. Anim. Sci., 5(3): 114-121.
38. Sosnowski, M., Rola, J.G. and Osek, J. (2016) Alkaline phosphatase activity and microbiological quality of heat-treated goat milk and cheeses. Small Rumin. Res., 136: 132-136. [Crossref]
39. Sandilya, S.P., Gogoi, A., Bhuyan, P.M. and Gogoi, D.K. (2014) Phosphatase activity of microbial populations in different milk samples in relation to protein and carbohydrate content. Not. Sci. Biol., 6(4): 465-469. [Crossref]
40. Sahai, D. (1996) Buffalo milk: Chemistry and processing technology. Shalini International (SI) Publications, Karnal, India.
41. Jandal, J.M. (1995) Some factors affecting lipase activity in goat milk. Small Rumin. Res., 16(1): 87-91. [Crossref]42. Chandan, R.C., Parry, R.M. and Shahani, K.M. (2008) Lysozyme, lipase, and ribonuclease in milk of various species. J. Dairy Sci., 51: 606-626. [Crossref]