Open Access
Research (Published online: 03-11-2018)
2. Impact of the flour of Jerusalem artichoke on the production of methane and carbon dioxide and growth performance in calves
Sintija Jonova, Aija Ilgaza, Inga Grinfelde and Maksims Zolovs
Veterinary World, 11(11): 1532-1538

Sintija Jonova: Preclinical Institute , Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kr. Helmana Street 8, Jelgava, LV-3004, Latvia.
Aija Ilgaza: Preclinical Institute , Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kr. Helmana Street 8, Jelgava, LV-3004, Latvia.
Inga Grinfelde: Department of Environment and Water Management , Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies, Faculty of Environmental and Civil Engineering, Akademijas Street 19, Jelgava, LV-3001, Latvia.
Maksims Zolovs: Department of Biosystematics , Daugavpils University, Institute of Life Sciences and Technology, Parades Street 1a, Daugavpils, LV-5401, Latvia.

doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2018.1532-1538

Share this article on [Facebook] [LinkedIn]

Article history: Received: 06-06-2018, Accepted: 24-09-2018, Published online: 03-11-2018

Corresponding author: Sintija Jonova


Citation: Jonova S, Ilgaza A, Grinfelde I, Zolovs M (2018) Impact of the flour of Jerusalem artichoke on the production of methane and carbon dioxide and growth performance in calves, Veterinary World, 11(11): 1532-1538.

Aim: The aim of the research was to evaluate the growth performance, to measure the amount of methane (CH4) and carbon dioxide (CO2) in calves' rumen, and to compare the obtained results between the control group (CoG) and the experimental group (Pre12) which received the additional supplement of the prebiotic inulin.

Materials and Methods: The research was conducted with ten Holstein Friesian (Bos taurus L.) crossbreed calves with an average age of 33±6 days. Calves were split into two groups: 5 calves that were fed with the control non-supplemented diet (CoG) and 5 calves that were fed with the same diet further supplemented with 12 g of flour of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) containing 6 g of prebiotic inulin per 0.5 kg of barley flour diet (Pre12). The duration of the experiment was 56 days. CH4 and CO2 were measured using cavity ringdown spectroscopy device Picarro G2508. The weight and samples from calves' rumen were evaluated 3 times during the experimental period - on the 1st, 28th, and 56th days. Samples were obtained by puncturing the calf rumen.

Results: The weight gain (kg) during the whole experimental period was higher in the Pre12 (65.8±6.57) compared to CoG (36.8±7.98) calves (p<0.001). The daily weight gain was also increased in the Pre12 (1.2±0.12) than CoG (0.7±0.14) calves (p<0.001). There was no difference in the levels of CH4 and CO2 produced in the rumen of CoG and Pre12 calves (p>0.05).

Conclusion: The main results showed that the prebiotic inulin can promote weight gain in calves, without affecting the mean concentration of CH4 and CO2 in calves' rumen.

Keywords: calves, carbon dioxide, inulin, methane, weight gain.


1. Stocker, T.F., Qin, G., Plattner, K., Tignor, M., Allen, S.K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V. and Midgley, P.M., editor. (2013) IPCC (Intergovernmental panel on climate change), climate change 2013: The physical science basis. In: Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, USA. p1535.

2. Field, C.B., Barros, V.R., Dokken, D.J., Mach, K.J., Mastrandrea, M.D., Bilir, T.E., Chatterjee, M., Ebi, K.L., Estrada, Y.O., Genova, R.C., Girma, B., Kissel, E.S., Levy, A.N., MacCracken, S., Mastrandrea, P.R. and White, L.L., editor. (2014) IPCC (Intergovernmental panel on climate change), Climate change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: Global and sectoral aspects. In: Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, USA. p1132.

3. Gerber, P.J., Steinfeld, H., Henderson, B., Mottet, A., Opio, C., Dijkman, J., Falcucci, A. and Tempio, G. (2013) Tackling Climate Change through Livestock-A Global Assessment of Emissions and Mitigation Opportunities. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome.

4. Scheehle, E.A. and Kruger, D. (2006) Global anthropogenic methane and nitrous oxide emissions. Energy J. Spec., 27(3): 33-44. [Crossref]

5. Moumen, A., Azizi, G., Chekrouk, B. and Baghour, M. (2016) The effects of livestock methane emission on global warming: A review. Int. J. Glob. Warming, 9(2): 229-253. [Crossref]

6. UNFCCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change), (1998) Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Adopted at COP3 in Kyoto, Japan.

7. Iqbal, M., Cheng, Y., Zhu, W. and Zeshan, B. (2008) Mitigation of ruminant methane production: Current strategies, constraints and future options. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 24(12): 2747-2755. [Crossref]

8. Moss, A.R., Jouany, J.P. and Newbold, J. (2000) Methane production by ruminants: Its contribution to global warming. Ann. Zootechnol., 49(3): 231-253. [Crossref]

9. Beverley, H. and Eckard, R. (2009) Greenhouse gas emissions in livestock production systems. Trop. Grasslands, 43: 7-14.

10. Kataria, R. (2015) Use of feed additives for reducing greenhouse gas emissions from dairy farms. Microbiol. Res., 6(1): 19-25.

11. Howden, S.M. and O'Leary, G.J. (1997) Evaluating options to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from an Australian temperature wheat cropping system. Environ. Model. Softw., 12: 169-176. [Crossref]

12. Crittenden, R. and Playne, M.J. (2009) Prebiotics. In: Lee, Y.K., Salminen, S., editors. Handbook of Probiotics and Prebiotics. 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey. p331-339.

13. Shah, N.P. (2000) Effect of milk-derived bioactives: An overview. Br. J. Nutr., 84(S 1): 3-10.

14. Mwenya, B., Santosa, S.C., Gamo, Y., Kobayashi, T. and Takahashi, J. (2004) Effects of including beta 1-4 galacto-oligosaccharides, lactic acid bacteria or yeast culture on methanogenesis as well as energy and nitrogen metabolism in sheep. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 115(3-4): 313-326. [Crossref]

15. Ghosh, S. and Mehla, R.K. (2012) Influence of dietary supplementation of prebiotics (mannan oligosaccharide) on the performance of crossbred calves. Trop. Anim. Health Pro., 44(3): 617-622. [Crossref] [PubMed]

16. Heinrichs, A.J., Heinrichs, B.S. and Jones, C.M. (2013) Fecal and saliva IgA secretion when feeding a concentrated mannan oligosaccharide to neonatal dairy calves. Prof. Anim. Sci., 29(5): 457-462. [Crossref]

17. Arne, A. and Ilgaza, A. (2016) Different Dose Inulin Feeding Effect on Calf Digestion Canal State and Development. Proceedings of the 22nd International Scientific Conference Research for Rural Development. p116-119.

18. Jonova, S., Ilgaza, A. and Grinfelde, I. (2017) Methane Mitigation Possibilities and Weight Gain in Calves Fed with Prebiotic Inulin. Proceedings of the 23rd International Scientific Conference Research for Rural Development. p265-270. [Crossref]

19. Samanta, A.K., Jayapal, N., Senani, S., Kolte, A.P. and Sridhar, M. (2013) Prebiotic inulin: Useful dietary adjusts to manipulate the livestock gut microflora. Braz. J. Microbiol., 44(1): 1-14. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]

20. Fleming, S. and Groot, W.J. (1979) Preparation of high-fructose syrup from the tubers of the Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus). Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr., 12(1): 1-28. [Crossref]

21. Ilgaza, A., Arne, A., Gorodko, S. and Ilgazs, A. (2016) Impact of inulin on calves' growth and possible reduction of greenhouse gas emission. AGROFOR Int. J., 1(2): 88-94. [Crossref]

22. Dunn, O.J. (1964) Multiple comparisons using rank sums. Technometrics, 6(3): 241-252. [Crossref]

23. Kro, B. (2011) Effect of mannan oligosaccharides, inulin and yeast nucleotides added to calf milk replacer on rumen microflora, level of serum immunoglobulin and health condition of calves. Electron. J. Pol. Agric. Univ., 14(2): 1-18.

24. Kaufhold, J., Hammon, H.M. and Blum, J.W. (2000) Fructooligosaccharides supplementation effects on metabolic, endocrine and hematological traits in veal calves. J. Vet. Med. A., 47(1): 17-29. [Crossref] [PubMed]

25. Verdonk, J.M.A. and Van Leeuwen, P. (2004) The Application of Inulin Type Fructans in Diets for Veal Calves and Broilers. In 4th Orafti Research Conference-Inulin and Oligofructose Feed Good Factors for Health and Well Being, Paris, France. p50-51.

26. Webb, P.R, Kelogg, D.W., McGahee, M.W. and Johnson, Z.B. (1992) Addition of fructooligosaccharide (FOS) and sodium diacetate (SD) plus decoquinate (D) to milk replacer starter and starter grain fed to Holstein calves. J. Dairy Sci., 75(S1): 300.

27. Stover, M.G., Watson, R.R. and Collier, R.J. (2015) Pre-and probiotic supplementation in ruminant livestock production. In: Probiotics, Prebiotics, and Synbiotics: Bioactive Foods in Health Promotion. Academic Press, San Diego.

28. Van Leeuwen, P. and Verdonk, J.M.A. (2004) The Gastro-intestinal Degradation of Inulin Preparations and their effects on Production Performance and Gut Microflora in Calves. Animal Sciences Group Wageningen UR, Lelystad, Netherlands, Project nr 825.20552.02, Report No: 04/l00287. p1-31.

29. Govil, K., Yadav, D., Patil, A., Nayak, S., Baghel, R., Yadav, P. and Thakur, D. (2017) Feeding management for early rumen development in calves. J. Entomol. Zool. Stud., 5(3): 1132-1139.

30. Kumar, S., Puniya, A.K., Puniya, M., Dagar, S.S., Sirohi, S.K., Singh, K. and Griffith, G.W. (2009) Factors affecting rumen methanogens and methane mitigation strategies. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 25(9): 1557-1566. [Crossref]

31. Van Zijderveld, S.M., Fonken, B., Dijksra, J., Gerrits, W.J., Perdok, H.B., Fokkink, W. and Newbold, J.R. (2011) Effects of a combination of feed additives on methane production, diet digestibility, and animal performance in lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., 94(3): 1445-1454. [Crossref] [PubMed]

32. Hindrichsen, I.K., Wettstein, H.R., Machmuller, A., Soliva, C.R., Knudsen, K.E.B., Madsen, J. and Kreuzer, M. (2004) Effects of feed carbohydrates with contrasting properties on rumen fermentation and methane release in vitro. Can. J. Anim. Sci., 84(2): 265-276. [Crossref]

33. Czerkawski, J. and Breckenridge, G. (1969) Fermentation of various soluble carbohydrates by rumen micro-organisms with particular reference to methane production. Br. J. Nutr., 23(4): 925-937. [Crossref] [PubMed]

34. Poulsen, M., Jensen, B.B. and Engberg, R.M. (2012) The effect of pectin, corn and wheat starch, inulin and pH on in vitro production of methane, short chain fatty acids and on the microbial community composition in rumen fluid. Anaerobe, 18(1): 83-90. [Crossref] [PubMed]

35. Zhao, X.H., Gong, J.M., Shou, S., Liu, C.J. and Qu, M.R. (2014) The effect of starch, inulin, and degradable protein on ruminal fermentation and microbial growth in rumen simulation technique. Ital J Anim Sci., 13(1): 189-195. [Crossref]

36. Chung, Y.H., Walker, N.D., McGinn, S.M. and Beauchemin, K.A. (2011) Differing effects of 2 active dried yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) strains on ruminal acidosis and methane production in nonlactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., 94(5): 2431-2439. [Crossref] [PubMed]