Veterinary World


ISSN (Online): 2231-0916


 Editorial board

 Instructions for authors

 Reviewer guideline

 Open access policy





Open Access

Copyright: The authors. This article is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.

Research (Published online : 14-08-2013)

12. Synergistic effect of non starch polysaccharide enzymes, synbiotics and phytase on performance, nutrient utilization and gut health in broilers fed with sub-optimal energy diets - J. Narasimha, D. Nagalakshmi, Y. Ramana Reddy and S. T. Viroji Rao
Veterinary World, 6(10): 754-760

Aim: In view of the ban on antibiotic growth promoters (AGPs), an attempt was made to explore the possibility of harnessing synergistic effect of non starch polysaccharide (NSP) enzymes, synbiotics and phytase on performance, nutrient retention, gut health and histology of broilers fed with corn-soybean meal based low calorie diets.

Materials and Methods: A total of 150 a day-old broiler chicks were weighed, wing banded and randomly distributed into five experimental groups, six replicates per group and five birds per replicate and raised in electrically heated battery brooders. Evaluated the synergistic effect of the NSP enzymes, synbiotics and phytase alone or in combination, supplemented to cornsoybean meal based broiler diet, low in energy concentration (Basal diet (BD)) (-225 kcal lower metabolizable energy than standard diet (SD), on performance, nutrient retention, carcass traits, gut conditions and cost per kg live weight gain.

Results: The body weight gain in broiler chicks fed with BD supplemented with NSP enzymes, synbiotics and phytase was significantly (P<0.01) higher. Supplementation of NSP enzymes, synbiotics and phytase alone or in combination had significant effect on feed intake. Synergistic effect of NSP enzyme, synbiotics and phytase was observed on overall feed conversion ratio (1.86), which improved (P<0.05) in comparison to BD (2.06) and SD (2.02), respectively. The supplementation of NSP enzymes, synbiotics and phytase to BD improved (P<0.05) utilization of organic matter (OM), crude protein (CP), nitrogen free extract (NFE), gross energy (GE), phosphorus and the tibia ash compared to BD, whereas no effect on retention of DM and CF was observed. Intestinal viscosity and E. coli count significantly (P<0.01) reduced with addition of NSP enzymes, synbiotics plus phytase or combination of all. The supplementation of NSP enzymes, synbiotics plus phytase had no effect on intestinal histology. The cost of feeding was lower (P<0.01) in BD. Addition of these feed additives to BD did not increase the feeding cost and was comparable to unsupplemented ones and lower (P<0.01) than SD. Similarly, the feed cost

per kg live weight gain during various phases of broiler production was reduced (P<0.01) due to supplementation of all the feed additives compared to SD and BD.

Conclusions: It can be concluded from the above experiment that supplementing sub-optimal energy diets with NSP enzymes along with synbiotics and phytase improved body weight gain, FCR, nutrient retention, tibia ash and reduced the cost of production considerably.

Keywords: gut health, histology, live weight gain, NSP enzymes, nutrient retention, synbiotics, phytase,


1. Grashorn, M.A. (2010) Use of phytobiotics in broiler nutrition – an alternative to in feed antibiotics? Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences 19:338–347.
2. Panda, K., Rama Rao, S.V. and Raju, M.V.L.N. (2006) Natural growth promoters have potential in poultry feeding systems. Feed Technology 10 (8): 23-25.
3. Maiorka, A., Santin, A. M. E., Borges, S. A., Opalinski, M. and Silva, A. V. F. (2004) Evaluation of a mix of fumaric, lactic, citric and ascorbic acids on starter diets of broilers. Archives of Veterinary Science 9: 31-37.
4. Lokhande, D. Y., Ranade, A. S., Desai, D. N., Patil, M. B., Avari, P. E., Patwardhan, D. S., Adsul A. P. and Gaikwad, P. G. (2005) Comparative evaluation of prebiotic, probiotic and acidifier in broiler diets. Journal of Bombay Veterinary College 13 (1-2): 17-19.
5. National Research Council. (1994) Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. 9th ed. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
6. AOAC. (2005) Official Methods of Analysis of Association of official Analytical chemists 18th Edition (Virginia, USA, Association of official Analytical chemists).
7. Clayden, E. C. (1962) Practical section cutting and staining. 4th Edition, J and Churchil limited. pages: 137-139.
8. Culling, C. F. A. (1957) Hand Book of Histopathological Techniques. London Butterworth and company (publisher) Ltd. pages: 421-427
9. Duncan, D. D. (1955) Multiple range and multiple ' F' test, Biometrics 11:1-42.
10. Owens, B., Tucker, L., Collins, M. A. and Mc Cracken K. J. (2008) Effects of different feed additives alone or in combination on broiler performance, gut microflora and ileal histology. British Poultry Science 49 (2): 202-212.
11. Bozkurt, M. K., Kucukylmaz, A., «atl, U. and «nar, M. (2009) The effect of single or combined dietary supplemen- tation of prebiotics, organic acid and probiotics on performance and slaughter characteristics of broilers. South African Journal of Animal Science 39 (3): 45 – 52.
12. Markovic, R., Sefera, D., Krstic, M. and Petrujkic, B. (2009) Effect of different growth promoters on broiler performance and gut morphology. Archives of Veterinary Medicine 41: 163-169.
13. Jung, S. J., Houde, R., Baurhoo, B., Zhao, X, and Lee, B. H. (2008) Effects of galacto-oligosaccharides and a Bifidobacteria lactis-based probiotic strain on the growth performance and faecal microflora of broiler chickens. Poultry Science 87: 1694–1699.
14. Cowieson, A. J. and Adeola, O. (2005) Carbohydrases, protease and phytase have an additive beneficial effect in nutritionally marginal diets for broiler chicks. Poultry Science 84: 1860-1867.
15. Olukosi, O. A., Cowieson, A. J. and Adeola, O. (2007) Age- related influence of a cocktail of xylanase, amylase and protease or phytase individually or in combination in broiles. Poultry Science 86: 77-86.
16. Woyengo, T. A., Slominski, B. A. and Jones, R. O. (2010) Growth performance and nutrient utilization of broiler chickens fed diets supplemented with phytase alone or in combination with citric acid and multi carbohydrase. Poultry Science 89: 2221-2229.
17. Mountzouris, K. C., Tsitrsikos, P., Palamidi, I., Arvaniti, A., Mohnl, M., Schatzmayr, G. and Fegeros, K. (2010) Effects of probiotic inclusion levels in broiler nutrition on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, plasma immunoglo- bulins and cecal microflora composition. Poultry Science 89: 58-67.
18. Khan, S. H., Sardar, R. and Siddique, B. (2006) Influence of enzymes on performance of broilers fed sunflower-corn based diets. Pakistan Veterinary Journal 26 (3): 109-114.
19. Francesch, M. and Geraert, P. A. (2009) Enzyme complex containing carbohydrases and phytase improves growth performance and bone mineralization of broilers fed reduced nutrient corn-soybean based diets. Poultry Science 88: 1915- 1924.
20. Munj, C. P., Ranade, A. S., Desai, D. N., Avari. P. E., Patil, U. M. and Metakari, D. V. (2010) Studies on synergistic effects of certain common feed additives on carcass quality, intestinal pH and gut microflora in broilers. Indian Journal Animal Nutrition 27 (1): 93-95.
21. Farran, M.T., Barbour, G.W., Usayron, N. N., Darwish, A.H., Hasan H. Matchhlals, H. H., Hruby, M. and Askarian, V. M. (2010) Performance and carcass quality of broiler chickens fed a corn-soybean meal diet containing graded barley levels without or with enzymes. Journal of Poultry Science 47: 34-40.
22. Nadeem, M. A., Anjum, M. I., Khan, A. G. and Azim, A. (2005) Effect of dietary supplementation of non-starch polysaccharide degrading enzymes on growth performance of broiler chicks. Pakistan Veterinary Journal 25 (4): 183- 188.
23. Wageha, A., Ghareeb, K. and Bohm, J. (2008) Intestinal structure and function of broiler chickens on diets supple- mented with a symbiotic containing Enterococcus faecium and oligosaccharides. International Journal of Molecular Science 9 (11): 2205-2216.
PMid:19330069 PMCid:PMC2635618