Issue cover
Research Article | 10 Oct 2026

Growth performance, feed efficiency, blood biochemical responses, and survival of Cobb 500 broilers receiving a phytogenic detoxifying additive under natural multi-mycotoxin exposure

Luis Antonio Azabache Asmat1, Miguel Angel Callacná Custodio2, Ysabel Cristina Koga Yanagui3, Javier Alejandro Azabache Asmat4, Jose Ricardo Esqueche Llagas1, Gilmar Mendoza Ordoñez5, Luigi Italo Villena Zapata6, and Anthony Jordan De La Cruz Castillo7 Show more
VETERINARY WORLD | Article No. 16 | pg no. 4569-4588 | Vol. 19, Issue 10 | DOI: 10.14202/vetworld.2026.4569-4588
Cited by 0

Cite this Article

  • APA
  • MLA
  • Chicago
  • Vancouver
  • Harvard

                            
                        

ABSTRACT

Background and Aim: Naturally occurring co-contamination of poultry feed with multiple mycotoxins can compromise broiler health and productive performance. Phytogenic formulations may provide complementary nutritional support under these conditions; however, evidence from commercial production systems remains limited. This study evaluated growth performance, feed efficiency, blood biochemical responses, and survival of Cobb 500 broilers receiving a natural detoxifying additive containing cynarin, betaine, boldine, and allicin during natural multi-mycotoxin exposure.

Materials and Methods: A comparative 40-day commercial field study included 828 one-day-old Cobb 500 broilers allocated to male control, female control, male experimental, and female experimental groups (n = 207/group). The additive was administered at 1 mL/L of drinking water on days 3–5, 16–18, and 29–31. One commercial house received the additive, and one served as the untreated control; therefore, house was the experimental unit for supplementation (n = 1/treatment). Feed contained naturally occurring fumonisins, deoxynivalenol, zearalenone, and T-2 toxin. Growth, feed utilization, mortality, flock uniformity, and blood biochemical parameters were evaluated. Bird-level comparisons were adjusted for multiple testing using the Benjamini–Hochberg procedure.

Results: At day 40, supplemented males were 95.33 g heavier than control males (2403.68 vs. 2308.35 g; p < 0.001; q = 0.001), whereas the corresponding difference in females was 16.01 g. A significant sex × treatment interaction was detected for final body weight (p = 0.008). The supplemented house showed a higher European Efficiency Factor (348 vs. 326). Supplemented females had lower feed intake and feed conversion ratio (1.91 vs. 2.02) and no mortality (0/207 vs. 6/207; p = 0.030). Creatinine was lower in supplemented females on days 26 and 40, while gamma-glutamyl transferase activity was lower in supplemented males on day 15; these differences remained significant after false discovery rate adjustment.

Conclusion: Broilers in the supplemented house showed favorable productive and selected biochemical responses under natural multi-mycotoxin exposure. However, because supplementation was confounded with house, the findings cannot establish a causal additive effect. Replicated multi-house trials are required to confirm efficacy.

Keywords: blood biochemistry, broiler chickens, feed efficiency, growth performance, multi-mycotoxin exposure, phytogenic feed additives, poultry nutrition, survival.