Open Access
Research (Published online: 19-05-2020)
16. Evaluation of ensiled soy sauce by-product combined with several additives as an animal feed
Sadarman Sadarman, Muhammad Ridla, Nahrowi Nahrowi, Roni Ridwan and Anuraga Jayanegara
Veterinary World, 13(5): 940-946

Sadarman Sadarman: Study Program of Nutrition and Feed Science, Graduate School of IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia; Department of Animal Science, Sultan Syarif Kasim State Islamic University, Pekanbaru, Indonesia.
Muhammad Ridla: Department of Nutrition and Feed Technology, Faculty of Animal Science, IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia.
Nahrowi Nahrowi: Department of Nutrition and Feed Technology, Faculty of Animal Science, IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia.
Roni Ridwan: Research Center for Biotechnology, Indonesian Institute of Sciences, Cibinong, Indonesia.
Anuraga Jayanegara: Department of Nutrition and Feed Technology, Faculty of Animal Science, IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia.

doi: www.doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2020.940-946

Share this article on [Facebook] [LinkedIn]

Article history: Received: 21-11-2019, Accepted: 15-04-2020, Published online: 19-05-2020

Corresponding author: Anuraga Jayanegara

E-mail: anuraga.jayanegara@gmail.com

Citation: Sadarman S, Ridla M, Nahrowi N, Ridwan R, Jayanegara A (2020) Evaluation of ensiled soy sauce by-product combined with several additives as an animal feed, Veterinary World, 13(5): 940-946.
Abstract

Aim: The present experiment aimed to evaluate the use of different additives, i.e., lactic acid bacteria (LAB) inoculant, tannin extract, and propionic acid, on the chemical composition, fermentative characteristics, and in vitro ruminal fermentation of soy sauce by-product (SSB) silage.

Materials and Methods: SSB was subjected to seven silage additive treatments: Fresh SSB, ensiled SSB, ensiled SSB+LAB, ensiled SSB+2% acacia tannin, ensiled SSB+2% chestnut tannin, ensiled SSB+0.5% propionic acid, and ensiled SSB+1% acacia tannin+1% chestnut tannin+0.5% propionic acid. Ensiling was performed for 30 days in three replicates, and each replicate was made in duplicate. The samples were evaluated for their chemical composition and silage fermentation characteristics and were tested in an in vitro rumen fermentation system.

Results: In general, the nutrient compositions did not differ among the tested SSBs in response to the different additives used. The addition of tannins, either acacia or chestnut, and propionic acid significantly decreased the pH of the ensiled SSB (p<0.05). The addition of several additives (except LAB) decreased the ammonia concentration in SSB silage (p<0.05). The total volatile fatty acids in the in vitro rumen fermentation profile of the ensiled SSB were not significantly altered by the various additives applied. The addition of some additives, i.e., ensiled SSB+LAB and ensiled SSB+2% acacia tannin, reduced the digestibility values of the SSB (p<0.05). Different silage additives did not significantly affect methane production, although the addition of acacia tannins tended to result in the lowest methane production among treatments.

Conclusion: The use of additives, particularly 2% acacia tannins, can reduce proteolysis in SSB silage.

Keywords: additive, feed, silage, soy sauce, tannins.