Veterinary World

     Open access and peer reviewed journal  

ISSN (Online): 2231-0916

ISSN (Print): 0972-8988

 

Home l Editorial board l Instructions for authors l Reviewer guideline l Open access policy l Archives l FAQ


Open Access

Copyright: The authors. This article is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.


Review (Published online: 27-08-2014)

14. Metabolizable protein systems in ruminant nutrition: A review - Lalatendu Keshary Das, S. S. Kundu, Dinesh Kumar and Chander Datt

Veterinary World, 7(8): 622-629

 

 

   doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2014.622-629



Lalatendu Keshary Das: Veterinary Dispensary, Kalampur, Kalahandi, Odisha, India; drlalatendu27@gmail.com

S. S. Kundu: Division of Dairy Cattle Nutrition, National DairyResearch Institute, Karnal, Haryana, India; sskundu.kln@gmail.com

Dinesh Kumar: Division of Animal Nutrition, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Uttar Pradesh, India; kr.dinesh7@gmail.com

Chander Datt: Division of Dairy Cattle Nutrition, National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana, India; chandatt@gmail.com

 

Received: 15-05-2014, Revised: 07-07-2014, Accepted: 15-07-2014, Published online: 27-08-2014

 

Corresponding author: Lalatendu Keshary Das, email: drlalatendu27@gmail.com



Protein available to ruminants is supplied by both microbial and dietary sources. Metabolizable protein (MP) is the true protein which is absorbed by the intestine and supplied by both microbial protein and protein which escapes degradation in the rumen; the protein which is available to the animal for maintenance, growth, fetal growth during gestation, and milk production. Thus, the concept of balancing ruminant rations basing on only dietary crude protein (CP) content seems erroneous. In India, ruminant rations are still balanced for digestible CP and total digestible nutrients for protein and energy requirements, respectively. Traditional feed analysis methods such as proximate analysis and detergent analysis consider feed protein as a single unit and do not take into account of the degradation processes that occur in rumen and passage rates of feed fractions from rumen to intestine. Therefore, the protein requirement of ruminants should include not only the dietary protein source, but also the microbial CP from rumen. The MP systems consider both the factors, thus predict the protein availability more accurately and precisely. This system is aptly designed to represent the extent of protein degradation in the rumen and the synthesis of microbial protein as variable functions. Feed protein fractions, i.e., rumen degradable protein and rumen undegradable protein play vital roles in meeting protein requirements of rumen microbes and host animal, respectively. With the advent of sophisticated nutrition models such as Cornell net carbohydrate and protein system, National Research Council, Agricultural Research Council, Cornell Penn Miner Dairy and Amino Cow; ration formulation has moved from balancing diets from CP to MP, a concept that describes the protein requirements of ruminantsat intestinal level, and which is available to animals for useful purposes.

Keywords: digestible crude protein, metabolizable protein, microbial protein, protein requirement, total digestible nutrients.



1. Datta, D. (2013). Indian fodder management towards 2030: A case of vision or myopia. Int. J. Manage. Soc. Sci. Res., 2(2): 33-41.
 
2. Dikshit, A.K. and Birthal, P.S. (2010). India's livestock feed demand: Estimates and projections. Agric. Econ. Res. Rev., 23: 15-28.
 
3. NRC. (1996). Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle. 7th ed. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
 
4. Van Soest, P.J. (1994). Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant. 2nd ed. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York.
 
5. Varga, G.A. (2007). Why use metabolizable protein for ration balancing? Proceedings of Pennsylvania State Dairy Cattle Nutrition Workshop, Grantville, PA. p. 51-57.
PMid:18297794
 
6. Beever, D.E. and Cottrill, B.R. (1994). Protein systems for feeding ruminant livestock: A European assessment. J. Dairy Sci., 77(7): 2031-2043.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(94)77148-4
 
7. Beever, D.E. (1996). Meeting the protein requirement of ruminant livestock. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci., 26(1): 20-26.
 
8. Schwab, C.G. and Ordway, R.S. (2004). Balancing diets for amino acids: Implications of production efficiency and feed costs. Proceedings of Pennsylvania State Dairy Cattle Nutrition Workshop, Grantville, PA. p1-16.
 
9. NRC. (2001). Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. 7th Revised ed. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
 
10. Burroughs, W., Trenkle, A. and Vetter, R.L. (1974). A system of protein evaluation for cattle and sheep involving metabolizable protein (amino acids) and urea fermentation potential of feedstuffs. Vet. Med. Small Anim. Clin., 69(6): 713.
PMid:4494868
 
11. ARC. (1984). The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock. Suppl. 1. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough, UK.
 
12. NRC. (1985). Ruminant Nitrogen Usage. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
 
13. AFRC. (1992). Technical Committee on Responses to Nutrients, Report No. 9. Nutritive Requirements of Ruminant Animals: Protein. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough, UK.
 
14. Kebreab, E., France, J., Mills, J.A.N., Allison, R. and Dijkstra, J. (2002). A dynamic model of N metabolism in the lactating dairy cow and an assessment of impact of N excretion on the environment. J. Anim. Sci., 80: 248-259.
PMid:11833535
 
15. Whitehouse, N., Schwab, C., Luchini, D., Tylutki, T and Sloan, B. (2009). Comparison of optimal lysine and methionine concentrations in metabolizable protein estimated by the NRC (2001), CPM-Dairy (v.3.0.10) and ATMS. Cattle (v.2.1.1) models. J. Anim. Sci., 92 (Suppl. 1): 103. (Abstr.)
 
16. Rius, A.G., Mcgilliard, M.L., Umberger, C.A. and Hanigan, M.D. (2010). Interactions of energy and predicted metabolizable protein in determining nitrogen efficiency in the lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., 93(5): 2034-2043.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2008-1777
PMid:20412918
 
17. Aboozar, M. (2012). Impacts of dietary metabolizable protein on performance and ruminal parameters of Holstein cows at early lactation. Res. Opin. Anim. Vet. Sci., 2(2): 102-108.
 
18. Lee, C., Hristov, A.N., Heyler, K.S. and Cassidy, T.W. (2012) Effect of metabolizable protein supply and amino acid supplementation on nitrogen utilization, milk production, and ammonia emission from manure in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., 95(9): 5253-5268.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-5366
PMid:22916930
 
19. Wilkerson, A., Klopfenstein, T.J., Britton, R.A., Stock, R.A. and Miller, P.S. (1993) Metabolizable protein and amino acid requirements of growing cattle. J. Anim. Sci., 71(10): 2777-2784.
PMid:8226380
 
20. Verite, R. (1987). In: Jarrige, R. and Alderman, G., editors. Present situation of protein evaluation for ruminants in France: The PDI system. Commission of the European Communities, Luxembourg. p11-20.
 
21. Jarrige, R. (1989). Ruminant Nutrition: Recommended Allowances and Feed Tables. John Libbey Eurotext, Montrouge, France.
 
22. Das, L.K. (2012). Metabolizable protein availability from different feeds and the effects of its graded levels in the diet on nutrient utilization in growing Sahiwal calves. M.V.Sc. Thesis, Division of Dairy Cattle Nutrition, National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana, India.
 
23. Robson, G.L.V., Filho, S.C.V., Diniz, R.V.F., Luciana, N.R., Veiga, P.P.R. and de Souza, M.A. (2007) Effects of increasing dietary crude protein levels on nitrogen balance and metabolizable protein requirements for maintenance in Nellore cattle. Braz. J. Anim. Sci., 36(4): 1212-1217.
 
24. Ezekiel, J.M.B. (1987). Protein and energy requirements of cattle: Endogenous fractions. Ph. D. Thesis in Animal Science. Federal University of Vicosa, Minas Gerais.
 
25. Valadares, R.F.D. (1997). Protein levels in diets for cattle: Intake, digestibility, microbial efficiency, ruminal ammonia, urea and plasma urea and creatinine excretions. Ph. D. Thesis in Animal Science. Federal University of Vicosa, Minas Gerais.
 
26. Hill, M.M. (1998). Consumption, total and partial digestibility of diets containing different levels of concentrate in Nellore. M.Sc. Dissertation (Zoology), Federal University of Vicosa, Minas Gerais.
 
27. Vermeulen, C. (2001). Metabolizable protein requirements of early lactating beef cows grazing dormant native (Oklahoma) range. Agricola., 1 116-123.
 
28. Luo, J., Goetsch, A.L., Nsahlai, I.V., Sahlu, T., Ferrell, C.L., Owens, F.N., Galyean, M.L., Moore, J.E. and Johnson, Z.B. (2004a). Metabolizable protein requirements for maintenance and gain of growing goats. Small Rumin. Res., 53: 309-326.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2004.04.003
 
29. Luo, J., Goetsch, A.L., Nsahlai, I.V., Sahlu, T., Ferrell, C.L., Owens, F.N., Galyean, M.L., Moore, J.E. and Johnson, Z.B. (2004b). Prediction of metabolizable energy and protein requirements for maintenance, gain and fiber growth of Angora goats. Small Rumin. Res., 53: 339-356.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2004.01.003
 
30. Silva, A.M.A., Sobrinho, A.G.S., Trindade, I.A.C.M., Resende, K.T. and Bakke, O.A. (2007). Net and metabolizable protein requirements for body weight gain in hair and wool lambs. Small Rumin. Res., 67: 192-198.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2005.10.012
 
31. CNCP. (2003). The net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluating herd nutrition and nutrient excretion. CNCPS Version 5.0., Cornell University, 130 Morrison Hall, Ethaca, New York.
 
32. Blouin, J.P., Bernier, J.F., Reynolds, C.K., Lobley, G.E., Dubreuilg, P. and Lapierre, H. (2002). Effect of supply of metabolizable protein on splanchnic fluxes of nutrients and hormones in lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., 85(10): 2618-2630.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74347-6
 
33. Doepel, L. and Lapierre, H. (2006). Challenges in protein nutrition for dairy cows. WCDS Adv. Dairy Technol., 18: 57-67.
 
34. Raggio, G., Pacheco, D., Berthiaume, R., Lobley, G.E. and Pellerin, D. (2004). Effect of level of metabolizable protein on splanchnic flux of amino acids in lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., 87(10): 3461-3472.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73481-5
 
35. Weiss, W.P. and Wyatt, D.J. (2006). Effect of corn silage hybrid and metabolizable protein supply on nitrogen metabolism of lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., 89(5): 1644-1653.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72231-7
 
36. Wang, C., Liu, J.X., Yuan, Z.P., Wu, Y.M., Zhai, S.W. and Ye, H.W. (2007). Effect of level of metabolizable protein on milk production and nitrogen utilization in lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., 90(6): 2960-2965.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2006-129
PMid:17517736
 
37. Yu, P., Rossnagel, B.G. and Niu, Z. (2008). Protein value of a new genotype oat (CDC SO-I) for the NRC dairy model: Protein degradation balance and kinetics, protein fractions and total metabolizable protein supply. Can. J. Anim. Sci., 88(3): 507-513.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4141/CJAS07137
 
38. Taghizadeh, A., Safamehr, A., Palangi, V. and Mehmannavaz, Y. (2008). The determination of metabolizable protein of some feedstuffs used in ruminants. Res. J. Biol. Sci., 3(7): 804-806.
 
39. Yu, P. and Racz, V. (2010). Modeling nutrient supply to ruminants: Frost damaged wheat vs. normal wheat. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci., 23(3): 333-339.
 
40. Damiran, D. and Yu, P. (2012). Metabolic characteristics in ruminants of the protein in newly developed hull less barley varieties with altered starch traits. J. Cereal Sci., 55: 351-360.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2012.01.006
 
41. Xin, H. and Yu. P. (2014). Rumen degradation, intestinal and total digestion characteristics and metabolizable protein supply of carinata meal (a non-conventional feed resource) in comparison with canola meal. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 191: 106-110.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2014.01.013
 
42. Theodoridou, K. and Yu, P. (2013). Metabolic characteristics of the proteins in yellow-seeded and brown-seeded canola meal and press cake in dairy cattle: comparison of three systems (PDI, DVE and NRC) in nutrient supply and feed milk value (FMV). J. Agric. Food Chem., 61(11): 2820-2830.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf305171z
PMid:23410190
 
43. Nuez Ortin, W. and Yu, P. (2010). Modeling the metabolic characteristics of proteins in dairy cattle from co-products of bioethanol processing: Comparison of the NRC 2001 model with DVE/OEB system. J. Sci. Food Agric., 91(3): 405-411.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.4199
PMid:20960458
 
44. Wang, Y., Xin, H.S., Li, Y.Z., Zhang, W.W., Xia, K., Wang, Z.B., Li, M. and Zhang, Y.G. (2012). The effects of different processing methods on the estimated nutritional value of rice bran according to NRC-2001 model or DVE/OEB system. J. Anim. Feed Sci., 21: 503-520.
 
45. Pooponpan, P., Chinrasri, O., Saenthaweesuk, S. and Chantiratikul, A. (2011). Evaluation of metabolizable protein and metabolizable energy values of Wolffia meal [Wolffia globosa (L). Wimm.] in broilers. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 10(5): 401-403.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2011.401.403
 
46. Islam, M.R., Ishida, M., Ando, S., Nishida, T. and Yoshida, N. (2011). Whole crop rice silage: Prediction of yield and content of metabolizable energy, metabolizable protein and other nutrients for dairy cows from crop maturity and botanical fractions at harvest. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 163: 222-230.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2010.11.007
 
47. Chase, L.E. (2011). Maintaning milk yield while lowering dietary protein content. WCDS Adv Dairy Technol., 23: 153-164.
 
48. Vahdani, N., Moravej, H., Rezayazdi, K. and Dehgham-Banadaki, M. (2014). Evaluation of nutritive value of grass pea hay in sheep nutrition and its palatability as compared with alfalfa. J. Agric. Sci. Techol., 16: 537-550.
 
49. Khalilvandi-Behroozyar, H., Dehghan-Banadaki, M. and Rezayazdi, K. (2010). Palatability, in situ and in vitro nutritive value of dried sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia). J. Agric. Sci., 148(6): 723-733.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0021859610000523
 
50. Ebrahimi, B., Taghizadeh, A., Mehmannavaz, Y. and Palangi, V. (2012). Evaluation of pomegranate pomace using in situ and gas production techniques. J. Environ. Sci. Eng., A1: 951-955.
 
51. Piri, A., Palangi, V. and Eivazi, P. (2012). The determination of nutritive value of Alhagi by in situ and gas production techniques. Euro. J. Exp. Biol., 2(3): 846-849.
 
52. Huhtanen, P., Hetta, M. and Swensson, C. (2011). Evaluation of canola meal as a protein supplement for dairy cows: A review and a meta-analysis. Can. J. Anim. Sci., 91: 529-543.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4141/cjas2011-029
 
53. Lee, C., Hristov, A.N., Heyler, K.S., Cassidy, T.W., Long, M., Corl, B.A. and Karnati, S.K.R. (2011). Effects of dietary protein concentration and coconut oil supplementation on nitrogen utilization and production in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., 94(11): 5544-5557.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-3889
PMid:22032378
 
54. Rahbarpour, A., Palangi, V., Eivagi, P. and Jalili, M. (2012). Calculation of metabolizable protein and energy of tomato pomace by nylon bags and gas production datas. Eur. J. Exp. Bio.,2(3): 822-825.
 
55. Das, L.K., Kundu, S.S., Kumar, D. and Datt, C. (2014). The evaluation of metabolizable protein content of some indigenous feedstuffs used in ruminant nutrition. Vet. World., 7(4): 257-261.
http://dx.doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2014.257-261
 
56. Cooper, R., Milton, T. and Klopfenstein, T.J. (2000). Phase feeding of metabolizable protein in steers. Nebraska Beef Cattle Report. p62-65.
 
57. Colin-Schoellen, O., Jorjanz, S. and Laurent, F. (2000). Metabolizable protein supply (PDIE) and restricted level of ruminally degradable nitrogen (PDIN) in total mixed rations: Effect on milk production and composition and on nitrogen utilization by dairy cows. Livest. Prod. Sci., 67(1): 41-53.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(00)00191-3
 
58. Whitlock, B.K., Vandehaar, M.J., Silva, L.F.P. and Tucker, H.A. (2002). Effect of dietary protein on prepubertal mammary development in rapidly growing dairy heifers. J. Dairy Sci., 85(6): 1516-1525.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74221-5
 
59. Faverdin, P., M'hamed, D. and Verite, R. (2003) Effects of metabolizable protein on intake and milk production of dairy cows independent of effects on ruminal digestion. Anim. Sci., 76: 137-146.
 
60. Patterson, H.H., Adams, D.C., Klopfenstein, T.J., Clark, R.T. and Teichert, B. (2003b) Supplementation to meet metabolizable protein requirements of primiparous beef heifers: II. Pregnancy and economics. J. Anim. Sci., 81(3): 563-570.
PMid:12661635
 
61. Waterman, R.C., Sawyer, J.E., Mathis, C.P., Hawkins, D.E., Donart, G.B. and Petersen, M.K. (2006). Effects of supplements that contain increasing amounts of metabolizable protein with or without Ca-propionate salt on postpartum interval and nutrient partitioning in young beef cows. J. Anim. Sci., 84(2): 433-446.
PMid:16424272
 
62. Huhtanen, P., Rinne, M. and Nousiainen, J. (2008). Effects of silage soluble nitrogen components on metabolizable protein concentration: A meta analysis dairy cow production experiments. J. Dairy Sci., 91(3): 1150-1158.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2007-0323
PMid:18292271
 
63. Voltolini, T.V., Santos, F.A.P., Martinez, J.C., Imaizumi, H., Pires, A.V. and Penati, M.A. (2008). Metabolizable protein supply according to the NRC (2001) for dairy cows grazing elephant grass. Sci. Agricola., 65(2): 130-138.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-90162008000200004
 
64. Weiss, W.P., St-Pierre, N.R. and Willett, L.B. (2009). Varying type of forage, concentration of metabolizable protein, and source of carbohydrate affects nutrient digestibility and production by dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., 92(11): 5595-5606.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2247
PMid:19841220
 
65. Nichols, B.M., Mcdonald, T.J., Harbac, M.M., Roberts, A.J. and Paterson, J.A. (2010). Effects of gestational dietary metabolizable protein level and dry matter intake on subsequent production traits in primiparous heifers. Proc. West. Sect. Am. Soc. Anim. Sci., 61: 35-40.
 
66. Amaral, G.A., Kozloski, G.V., Santos, A.B., Castagnino, D.S., Fluck, A.C., Farenzena, R., Alves, T.P. and Mesquita, F.R. (2011). Metabolizable protein and energy supply in lambs fed annual rye grass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.) supplemented with sources of protein and energy. J. Agric. Sci., 149(4): 519-527.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S002185961000122X
 
67. Imaizumi, H., Santos, F.A.P., Bittar, C.M.M., Correia, P.S. and Martinez, J.C. (2010). Diet crude protein content and sources for lactating dairy cows. Sci. Agricola., 67(1): 16-22.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-90162010000100003
 
68. Emon, M.L.V., Eckerman, S.E., Lekatz, L.A., Berg, P.B., Carlin, K.R.M., Vonnahme, K.A., Thompson, M.M. and Schauer, C.S. (2011). Effects of maternal metabolizable protein supplementation during the last 50 days of gestation on ewe and offspring performance and carcass characteristics. Sheep Research Report of USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture. p17-22.
 
69. NRC. (2007). Nutrient Requirements of Small Ruminants. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.