Veterinary World

     Open access and peer reviewed journal  

ISSN (Online): 2231-0916

ISSN (Print): 0972-8988

 

Home l Editorial board l Instructions for authors l Reviewer guideline l Open access policy l Archives l FAQ


Open Access

Copyright: The authors. This article is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License

(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.


Research (Published online: 12-10-2014)

9. Chemical composition, anti-oxidative activity and in vitro dry matter degradability of Kinnow mandarin fruit waste - Ravleen Kour, Ankur Rastogi, R. K. Sharma, Arvind Kumar and Pratiksha Raghuwanshi

Veterinary World, 7(10): 803-806

 

 

   doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2014.803-806

 

 

Ravleen Kour: Division of Animal Nutrition, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry, Sher-e-Kashmir University Agriculture Sciences and Technology of Jammu, R S Pura, Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir, India; dr.ravkour@gmail.com

Ankur Rastogi: Division of Animal Nutrition, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry, Sher-e-Kashmir University Agriculture Sciences and Technology of Jammu, R S Pura, Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir, India; dr_ankur76@rediffmail.com

R. K. Sharma: Division of Animal Nutrition, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry, Sher-e-Kashmir University

Agriculture Sciences and Technology of Jammu, R S Pura, Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir, India; rksann@rediffmail.com

Arvind Kumar: Division of Livestock Products Technology, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry, Sher-e-Kashmir University Agriculture Sciences and Technology of Jammu, R S Pura, Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir, India; drarvindlpt@gmail.com

Pratiksha Raghuwanshi: Division of Veterinary Physiology and Biochemistry, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry, Sher-e-Kashmir University Agriculture Sciences and Technology of Jammu, R S Pura, Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir, India; pratiksha.rastogi@gmail.com

 

Received: 16-06-2014, Revised: 02-09-2014, Accepted: 09-09-2014, Published online: 12-10-2014

 

Corresponding author: Ankur Rastogi, e-mail: dr_ankur76@rediffmail.com



Aim: Fruit processing and consumption yield a significant amount of by-products as waste, which can be used as potential nutrient suppliers for livestock. “Kinnow” (Citrus nobilis Lour x Citrus deliciosa Tenora) is one of the most important citrus fruit crops of North Indian States. Its residues are rich in carbohydrates but poor in protein and account for approximately 55-60% of the raw weight of the fruit. Present study assessed the chemical composition and anti-oxidative activity of Kinnow mandarin fruit waste (KMW) and scrutinized the impact of dietary incorporation of variable levels of KMW on in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD).

Materials and Methods: Sun dried and ground KMW was analyzed for proximate composition, fibre fractions and calcium and phosphorus content. Antioxidant potential of KMW as total phenolic count and 1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) scavenging activity was assayed in an alcoholic extract of KMW. The effect of inclusion of KMW at variable levels (0-40%) in the isonitrogenous concentrate mixtures on in vitro degradability of composite feed (concentrate mixture:Wheat straw; 40:60) was also carried out.

Results: KMW after sun-drying contained 92.05% dry matter. The crude protein content of 7.60% indicates it being marginal in protein content, whereas nitrogen free extract content of 73.69% suggests that it is primarily a carbonaceous feedstuff. This observation was also supported by low neutral detergent fiber and acid detergent fiber content of 26.35% and 19.50%, respectively. High calcium content (0.92%) vis-à-vis low phosphorus content (0.08%), resulted in wide Ca:P ratio (11.5) in KMW. High anti-oxidative potential of KMW is indicated by total phenolic content values of 17.1±1.04 mg gallic acid equivalents/g and DPPH free radicle scavenging activity 96.2 μg/ml (effective concentration 50). Mean IVDMD% of all the composite rations was found to be comparable (p>0.05) irrespective of the level of KMW inclusion, indicating no negative effect of KMW inclusion on in vitro nutrient utilization.

Conclusion: KMW is a carbonaceous feedstuff and may be incorporated in ruminant ration up to the level of 40% (w/w basis) without affecting in vitro degradability.

Keywords: antioxidant, in vitro dry matter digestibility, Kinnow mandarin waste, unconventional feedstuff.



1. NHB. (2014) Indian Horticulture Database 2013. National Horticulture Board, Gurgaon, India.
 
2. FAO, Wadhwa, M. and Bakshi M.P.S. (2013) Utilization of Fruit and Vegetable Wastes as Livestock Feed and as Substrates for Generation of other Value-Added Products. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy.
 
3. Grasser, L.A., Fadel, J.G., Garnett, I. and De Peters, E.J. (1995) Quantity and economic importance of nine selected by products used in California dairy rations. J. Dairy Sci., 78: 962-971.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(95)76711-X
 
4. Bampidis, V.A. and Robinson, P.H. (2006) Citrus by-products as ruminant feeds: A review. Anim. Feed. Sci. Tech., 128: 175-217.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2005.12.002
 
5. Sharma, S., Singh, B., Rani, G., Zaidi, A.A., Hallan, V., Nagpal, A. and Virik, G.S. (2007) In vitro production of Indian citrus ringspot virus (ICRSV) free Kinnow plants employing phyto-therapy coupled with shoot tip grafting. In Vitro. Cell. Dev-Plant., 43: 254-259.
 
6. Kalra, K.L., Grewal, H.S. and Kahlon, S.S. (1989) Bioconversion of Kinnow-mandarin waste into single-cell protein. Mircen J. Appl. Microb., 5: 321-326.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01741762
 
7. AOAC. (2012) Official Methods of Analysis. 19th ed., Vol. I. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, D.C.
 
8. Van Soest, P.J., Robertson, J.B. and Lewis, B.A. (1991) Methods for dietary fiber and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci., 74: 3583-3597.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2
 
9. Isabelle, M., Lee, B.L., Ong, C.N., Liu, X. and Huang, D. (2008) Peroxyl radical scavenging capacity, polyphenolics, and lipophilic antioxidant profiles of mulberry fruits cultivated in Southern China. J. Agric. Food Chem., 56(20): 9410-9416.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf801527a
PMid:18817415
 
10. Erel, O. (2004) A novel automated direct measurement method for total antioxidant capacity using a new generation, more stable DPPH radical cation. Clin. Biochem., 37: 277-285.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2003.11.015
PMid:15003729
 
11. Tilley, J.M.A. and Terry, R.A. (1963) A two stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. J. Br. Grassl. Soc., 18: 104-111.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.1963.tb00335.x
 
12. Snedecor, G.W. and Cochran, W.G. (1994) Statistical Methods. 8th ed. East West Press Private Limited, New Delhi.
 
13. Broderick, G.A., Mertens, D.R. and Simons, R. (2002) Efficacy of carbohydrate sources for milk production by cows fed diets based on alfalfa silage. J. Dairy Sci., 85: 1767-1776.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74251-3
 
14. Hall, M.B. (2003) Feeding sugar to ruminants. In: Proceedings of the Third National Symposium on Alternative Feeds for Livestock and Poultry, Kansas City, MO, USA. p65-76.
 
15. Oberoi, H.S., Chavan, Y., Bansal, S. and Dhillon, G.S. (2010) Production of cellulases through solid state fermentation using Kinnow pulp as a major substrate. Food Bioprocess Technol., 3: 528-536.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11947-008-0092-8
 
16. Babbar, N., Oberoi, H.S., Uppal, D.S. and Patil, R.T. (2011) Total phenolic content and antioxidant capacity of extracts obtained from six important fruit residues. Food Res. Int., 44: 391-396.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2010.10.001
 
17. Kaur, C. and Kapoor, H.C. (2000) Antioxidant activity and total phenolic content of some Asian vegetables. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol., 37: 153-161.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2621.2002.00552.x
 
18. Isabelle, M., Lee, B.L., Lim, M.T., Koh, W.P., Huang, D. and Ong, C.N. (2010) Antioxidant activity and profiles of common fruits in Singapore. Food Chem., 123: 77-84.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.04.002
 
19. Khalid, M.S., Malik, A.U., Khalid, S., Hafez, O. and Amin, M. (2013) Kinnow mandarin: The premier citrus of Pakistan, Agriculture Information Bank. Available from: http://wwwagrinfobank.wordpress.com/2013/05/13/kinnow-mandarin-the-premier-citrus-of-pakistan/. [Last accessed 2014 Jun 14].
 
20. Mensor, L.L., Menezes, F.S., Leitão, G.G., Reis, A.S., Santos, T.C., Coube, C.S. and Leitão, S.G. (2001) Screening of Brazilian plant extracts for antioxidant activity by the use of DPPH free radical method. Phytother. Res., 15: 127-130.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ptr.687
PMid:11268111
 
21. Devatkal, S., Narsaiah, K. and Borah, A. (2010) Antioxidant effect of extracts of Kinnow rind, pomegranate rind and seed powders in cooked goat meat patties, Meat. Sci., 85: 155-159.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.12.019
PMid:20374879
 
22. Sunvold, G.D., Hussein, H.S., Fahey Jr., G.C., Merchen, N.R. and Reinhart, G.A. (1995) In vitro fermentation of cellulose, beet pulp, citrus pulp, and citrus pectin using fecal inoculum from cats, dogs, horses, humans, and pigs and ruminal fluid from cattle. J. Anim. Sci., 73: 3639-3648.
PMid:8655439
 
23. Brown, W.F. and Johnson, D.D. (1991) Effects of energy and protein supplementation of ammoniated tropical grass hay on the growth and carcass characteristics of cull cows. J. Anim. Sci., 69: 348-357.
PMid:2005029
 
24. Barrios-Urdaneta, A., Fondevila, M. and Castrillo, C. (2003) Effect of supplementation with different proportions of barley grain or citrus pulp on the digestive utilization of ammonia-treated straw by sheep. Anim. Sci., 76: 309-317.
 
25. Bhattacharya, A.N. and Harb, M. (1973) Dried citrus pulp as a grain replacement for awasi lambs. J. Anim. Sci., 36: 1175-1180.
 
26. Martınez-Pascual, J. and Fernandez-Carmona, J. (1980) Citrus pulp in diets for fattening lambs. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 5: 11-22.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(80)90006-1