Veterinary World

     Open access and peer reviewed journal  

ISSN (Online): 2231-0916

ISSN (Print): 0972-8988

 

Home l Editorial board l Instructions for authors l Reviewer guideline l Open access policy l Archives l FAQ


Open Access

Copyright: The authors. This article is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License

(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.


Research (Published online: 12-04-2015)

7. Effect of climatic variables on production and reproduction traits of colored broiler breeder poultry - G. D. Nayak, N. C. Behura, K. K. Sardar and P. K. Mishra

Veterinary World, 8(4): 472-477

 

 

   doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2015.472-477

 

 

G. D. Nayak: Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Orissa University of Agriculture & Technology, Bhubaneswar - 751 003, Odisha, India; drgdnayak@gmail.com

N. C. Behura: Department of Poultry Science, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Orissa University of Agriculture & Technology, Bhubaneswar - 751 003, Odisha, India; ncbehura@gmail.com

K. K. Sardar: Department of Pharmacology & Toxicology, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Orissa University of Agriculture & Technology, Bhubaneswar - 751 003, Odisha, India; kksardar@gmail.com

P. K. Mishra: Department of Poultry Science, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Orissa University of Agriculture & Technology, Bhubaneswar - 751 003, Odisha, India; pkmishraouat@yahoo.in

 

Received: 18-11-2014, Revised: 23-02-2015, Accepted: 02-03-2015, Published online: 12-04-2015

 

Corresponding author: G. D. Nayak, e-mail: drgdnayak@gmail.com


Citation: Nayak GD, Behura NC, Sardar KK, Mishra PK (2015) Effect of climatic variables on production and reproduction traits of coloured broiler breeder poultry, Veterinary World 8(4): 472-477.



Aim: The present study was conducted to investigate the important climatic variables affecting production and reproduction in a broiler breeder flock.

Materials and Methods: The experiment was conducted for a period of 1 year on colored synthetic female line male and female poultry birds. 630 female progeny and 194 male progenies from 69 sires and 552 dams produced in four consecutive hatches at an interval of 10 days were used for the present study. Each of the seven, body weight and reproduction traits were regressed with nine environmental variables. Initially, the data were subjected to hatch effect and sire effect corrections through best linear unbiased estimator (BLUE) method and, then, multiple linear regressions of environmental variables on each trait were applied.

Result: The overall regression was significant (p<0.01) in all traits except 20 week age body weight of females. The R2 value ranged from 0.12 to 0.90 for the traits. Regression coefficient values (b values) for maximum temperature and minimum temperature were significant (p<0.05) on 5th week age body weight of males. Similarly, evaporation and morning relative humidity (RH) was significant (p<0.05) for 5th week age body weight of females. Almost all b values were significant (p<0.05) for egg production up to 40 week age. The b values representing rainfall, morning RH, afternoon RH, sunshine hours, and rainy days were significant (p<0.05) on bodyweight at 20 week age. All environmental variables except maximum temperature and minimum temperature were significant (p<0.05) on body weight of females at 20 weeks of age. Age at sexual maturity was regressed significantly (p<0.05) with evaporation, afternoon RH whereas, egg shape index was regressed significantly (p<0.05) with a maximum temperature, evaporation and afternoon RH.

Conclusion: The result indicated that various environmental variables play a significant role in production and reproduction of breeder broiler poultry. Controlling these variables in adverse weathers may increase production.

Keywords: Best linear unbiased estimator, climatic variables, colored breeder, multiple regressions, production, reproduction.



1. Menquesha, M. (2011) Climate change and the performance of rearing poultry for the demand of protein foods. Asian J. Poult. Sci., 5: 135-143.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/ajpsaj.2011.135.143
 
2. Okere, I.A. (2013) Growth traits, breast meat yield and quality of broiler genotypes under hot conditions. Iran. J. Appl. Anim. Sci., 4(1): 159-164.
 
3. Babinszky, L., Halas, V. and Verstegen, M.W.A. (2011) Impacts of climate change on animal production and quality of animal food products. In: Blanco, J. and Kheradmand, H., editors. Climate Change – Socio-Economic Effects. InTech, Croatia. ???. p165-190.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/23840
 
4. Adesiji, G.B., Tyabo, I.S., Bolarin, O., Ibrahim, M. and Baba, S.T. (2013) Effects of climate change on poultry production in Ondo State, Nigeria. Ethiop. J. Environ. Stud. Manage., 6(3): 242-248.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ejesm.v6i3.3
 
5. Alade, O.A. and Ademola, A.O. (2013) Perceived effect of climate variation on poultry production in Oke Ogun area of Oyo State. J. Agric. Sci., 5(10): 176-182.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/jas.v5n10p176
 
6. Mrode, R.A. (1996) Linear models for the prediction of animal breeding values. CAB International, Wallingford, UK. p37-66.
 
7. Becker, W.A. (1975) Manual of quantitative genetics. Students Book Corporation. 3rd ed. Pullman, Washington, USA. p41-52.
PMid:1092607
 
8. Mead, R. and Curnow, R.N. (1987) Statistical Methods in Agriculture and Experimental Biology. ELBS, London.
PMCid:PMC1710866
 
9. Gregory, N.G. (2010) How climatic changes could affect meat quality. Food Res. Int., 43: 1866-1873.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2009.05.018
 
10. Uzokwe, U.N. and Bakare, E.A. (2013) The effects of climate variability on poultry production in Ose Local Government area of Ondo State, Nigeria: Socio-economic characteristics and perceptions of farmers. Int. J. Agric. Biosci., 2(1): 39-44.
 
11. Frandson, R.A. (1981). Anatomy and Physiology of Farm Animals. 3rd ed. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, USA. p446.
 
12. Narahari, D. (1996) Commercial Broiler Production. 1st ed. Emkay Publications, Delhi. p54-59.
 
13. Weaver, W.D. Jr. (2002). Poultry housing and fundamentals of ventilation. In: Bell, D.D. and Weaver, W.D. Jr., editors. Commercial Chicken Meat and Egg Production. 5th ed. Springer, New York, USA. p101-128.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0811-3_8
 
14. Wineland, M.J. (2002) Fundamentals of managing light for poultry. In: Bell, D.D. and Weaver, W.D. Jr., editors. Commercial Chicken Meat and Egg Production. 5th ed. Springer, Spring City, New York, USA. p129-148.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0811-3_10
 
15. Elijah, O.A. and Adedapo, A. (2006). The effect of climate on poultry productivity in Ilorin Kwara state, Nigeria. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 5(11): 1061-1068.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2006.1061.1068
 
17. Lara, L.J. and Rostagno, M.H. (2013) Impact of heat stress on poultry production. Animals, 3: 356-369.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani3020356
 
18. Daghir, N.J. (2009) Nutritional strategies to reduce heat stress in broilers and broiler breeders. Lohmann Infn., 44(1): 6-15.
 
19. Mukherjee, T.K., Horst, P., Flock, D.K. and Petersen, J. (1980) Sire x location interactions from progeny tests in different countries. Br. J. Poult. Sci., 21: 123-129.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00071668008416646
 
20. Moreda, E., Singh, H., Sisaye, T. and Johansson, A.M. (2014) Phenotypic characterization of indigenous chicken population in South West and South part of Ethiopia. Br. J. Poult. Sci., 3(1): 15-19.
 
21. Bell, D.D. (2002) Egg handling and egg breakage. In: Bell DD and Weaver W D Jr. Editors.Commercial Chicken Meat and Egg Production. 5th ed. Springer, Spring City, New York, USA. p1091-1105.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0811-3_56
 
22. Renaudeau, D., Collin, A., Yahav, S., de Basilio, V., Gourdine, J. and Collier, R.J. (2010) Adaptation to tropical climate and research strategies to alleviate heat stress in livestock production. Adv. Anim. Biosci., 1(2): 378-379.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S2040470010000075