Veterinary World

     Open access and peer reviewed journal  

ISSN (Online): 2231-0916

 

Home l Editorial board l Instructions for authors l Reviewer guideline l Open access policy l Archives l FAQ


Open Access


Research (Published online: 24-08-2016)

17. Studies on the effectiveness of oral pellet vaccine in improving egg production and egg quality in desi chicken - T. Lurthu Reetha, J. Johnson Rajeswar, T. J. Harikrishnan, K. Sukumar, P. Srinivasan and J. John Kirubakaran

Veterinary World, 9(8): 900-903

 

 

   doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2016.900-903

 

 

T. Lurthu Reetha: Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University - Regional Research, Pudukkottai - 622 004, Tamil Nadu, India; drreethaarul@gmail.com

J. Johnson Rajeswar: Department of Veterinary Microbiology, Veterinary College and Research Institute, Tirunelveli - 627 001, Tamil Nadu, India; dr_johnswar@yahoo.com

T. J. Harikrishnan: Directorate of Research, Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chennai - 600 051, Tamil Nadu, India; tjhkrishnan@gmail.com

K. Sukumar: Department of Veterinary Microbiology, Veterinary College and Research Institute, Namakkal - 637 002, Tamil Nadu, India; drksugu@gmail.com

P. Srinivasan: Veterinary University Training and Research Centre, Nagapattinam, Tamil Nadu, India; srinipat2004@yahoo.com

J. John Kirubakaran: Department of Veterinary Microbiology, Madras Veterinary College, Chennai - 600 007, Tamil Nadu, India; jjohnk@gmail.com

 

Received: 31-03-2016, Accepted: 19-07-2016, Published online: 24-08-2016

 

Corresponding author: T. Lurthu Reetha, e-mail: drreethaarul@gmail.com


Citation: Reetha TL, Rajeswar JJ, Harikrishnan TJ, Sukumar K, Srinivasan P, Kirubakaran JJ (2016) Studies on the effectiveness of oral pellet vaccine in improving egg production and egg quality in desi chicken, Veterinary World, 9(8): 900-903.



Aim: To study the effect of Newcastle disease (ND) oral pellet vaccine in egg production and egg quality in desi chicken.

Materials and Methods: The study was conducted at Veterinary University Training and Research Centre, Tiruchirapalli, Tamil Nadu. A total of 48-day-old desi chicks obtained from a private hatchery in Namakkal, Tamil Nadu, were maintained under cage system of rearing up to 52 weeks of age as per standard management practices. All the 48 chicks were divided into six groups having eight chicks in each group were subjected to different treatment regimes. All the birds were challenged at 52 weeks of age with 0.5 ml dose of 104.0 egg infectious dose 50 virulent ND field virus. 10 eggs from each group were randomly collected during the last 3 days of 8 weeks interval period from 28 to 52 weeks of age and were used to measure the egg quality parameters. The production performance of each group was assessed at 4 weeks interval period from 25 to 52 weeks of age.

Results: In all the six treatment groups with respect to egg production, no significant difference (p≥0.05) was noticed from 25 to 52 weeks of age. Similarly, in egg weight, egg shape index and specific gravity, no significant difference (p≥0.05) was noticed from 28 to 52 weeks of age.

Conclusion: From this study, it is concluded that the administration of ND oral pellet vaccine to desi chicken does not affect the egg production performance, egg weight, egg shape index, and specific gravity of egg.

Keywords: effectiveness, egg production, egg quality, desi chicken, oral pellet vaccines.



1. Geetha, M., Gunaseelan, L., Ganesan, P.I., Kumanan, K. and Selvaraju, G. (2014) Role of free living birds as reservoirs of Newcastle disease virus infection. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol., 3(4): 1450-1454.
 
2. Cattoli, G., Susta, L., Terregino, C. and Brown, C. (2011) Newcastle disease: A review of field recognition and current methods of laboratory detection. J. Vet. Diagn. Invest., 23: 637-656.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1040638711407887
PMid:21908305
 
3. Kumaresan, A., Bujarbaruah, K.M., Pathak, K.A., Chettri, B., Ahmed, S.K. and Haunshi, S. (2008) Analysis of a village chicken production system and performance of improved dual purpose chickens under a subtropical hill agro-ecosystem in India. Trop. Anim. Health Prod., 40: 395-402.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11250-007-9097-y
PMid:18575965
 
4. Gueye, E.F. (2000) The role of family poultry in poverty alleviation, food security and the promotion of gender equality in rural Africa. Outlook Agric., 29(2): 129-136.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5367/000000000101293130
 
5. Okwor, E.C., Eze, D.C., Anyanwu, M.U., Okpe, C.B. and Eze, P.C. (2013) Effects of mixed vaccinations against Newcastle disease and infectious bursal disease on immune response feed consumption and weight gain in broilers. J. Agric. Vet. Sci., 6: 63-68.
 
6. El-Mahdy, S.S., Hayam, F., Abd El-Wanis, N.A. and Hamoud, M.M. (2013) Comparative studies between different commercial types of live infectious bursal disease [IBD] vaccine strains in Egypt. Am. J. Vet. Res., 1: 113-129.
 
7. Senne, D.A., King, D.J. and Kapczynski, D.R. (2004) Control of Newcastle disease by vaccination. Dev. Biol. (Basel), 119: 165-170.
 
8. Nasser, M., Lohr, J.E., Mebratu, G.Y., Zessin, K.H., Baumann, M.P.O. and. Ademe, Z. (2000) Oral Newcastle disease vaccination trials in Ethiopia. Avian Pathol., 29: 27-34.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03079450094243
PMid:19184785
 
9. Ideris, A., Ibrahim, A.L., Spradbrow, P.B. and Hung Seng, C. (1987) Development of food pellet Newcastle disease vaccine. In: Copland, J.W., editor. Newcastle Disease in Poultry: A New Food Pellet Vaccine. ACIAR, Canberra. p20-23.
 
10. FAO. (1991) Manual on production of Marek's disease. Gumboro Disease and Inactivated Newcastle Disease Vaccines. FAO Animal Production and Health Paper. p89.
 
11. OIE. (2000) Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals. Paris: OIE Publication; 2000.
 
12. Moreki, J.C., Dikeme, K. and Poroga, B. (2010) The role of village poultry in food security and HIV/AIDS mitigation in Chobe district of Botswana. Livest. Res. Rural. Dev., 22(10): http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd22/3/more22055.htm. Accessed on 05.01.2016.
 
13. Tadesse, D., Singh, H., Mengistu, A., Esatu, W. and Dessie, T. (2013) Study on productive performances and egg quality traits of exotic chickens under village production system in East Shewa, Ethiopia. Afr. J. Agric. Res., 8(13): 1123-1128.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5897/AJAR2013.6987
 
14. Bobbo, A.G., Baba, S.S. and Yahaya, M.S. (2013) Egg quality characteristic of three phenotypes of local chickens in Adamawa state. J. Agric. Vet. Sci., 4: 13-21.
 
15. Mengesha, M., Tamir, B. and Dessie, T. (2011) Village chicken constraints and traditional management practices in Jamma District, South Wollo, Ethiopia. Livest. Res. Rural Dev., 23: 37. Available from: http//www.lrrd.org/lrrd23/2/meng23037.htm. Accessed on 07.01.2016.
 
16. Tadesse, D., Esatu, W., Girma, M. and Dessie, T. (2015) Comparative study on some egg quality traits of exotic chickens in different production systems in East Shewa, Ethiopia. Afr. J. Agric. Res., 10(9): 1016-1021.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5897/AJAR2014.9373
 
17. Gueye, E. (2009) The role of networks in information dissemination to family poultry farmers. Worlds Poult. Sci. J., 65: 115-123.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0043933909000099
 
18. Pathak, P.K. and Nath, B.G. 2013.Rural poultry farming with improved breed of backyard chicken. J. World's Poult. Res., 3(1): 24-27.
 
19. Adwar, T. and Lukesova, D. (2008) Evaluation of thermostable vaccines against Newcastle disease in village chicken used in tropics and subtropics. Agric. Trop. Subtrop., 41(2): 74-79.
 
20. Bigbee, D.G. (1965) The Management of the Native Chickens of Ethiopia. Miscellaneous Publication No.5. HSIU, College of Agriculture, Alemaya.
 
21. Brannang, E. and Person, S. (1990) Ethiopian Animal Husbandry. Uppsala, Sweden. p127.
 
22. Ali, A and Anjun, R. (2013) Evaluation of egg quality traits among different breeds/strains of chicken locally available in Pakistan. J. Livest. Prod., 1: 16-23.
 
23. Shive, K., Blavir, S., Yadav, S.N., Bharadwaj, R.K. and Kumar, D. (2008) Studies on external and internal egg quality traits of local hill fowl under intensive system of rearing. Indian J. Poult. Sci., 43: 375-377.