Veterinary World

     Open access and peer reviewed journal  

ISSN (Online): 2231-0916

 

Home l Editorial board l Instructions for authors l Reviewer guideline l Open access policy l Archives l FAQ


Open Access


Research (Published online: 12-01-2016)

6. Effect of different culture systems on the production of foot and mouth disease trivalent vaccine - Amr Ismail Hassan

Veterinary World, 9(1): 32-37

 

 

   doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2016.32-37

 

Amr Ismail Hassan: Department of Foot and Mouth Disease, Veterinary Serum and Vaccine Research Institute, Abbasia, Cairo, Egypt; amr_hassanin@hotmail.com

Received: 01.09.2015, Revised: 23.11.2015, Accepted: 04.12.2015, Published online: 12-01-2016

 


Citation: Hassan AI (2016) Effect of different culture systems on the production of foot and mouth disease trivalent vaccine, Veterinary World, 9(1): 32-37.



Aim: This study aims to determine the effect of the stationary rawx, roller, and the suspension cell culture systems on the total virus yield infectivity and antigenicity.

Materials and Methods: Three serotypes of foot and mouth disease virus (FMDV) (serotype A, O and SAT-2) were inoculated separately into baby hamster kidney-21 cell line in rawx, roller, and suspension cultivation systems using multiplicity of infection (1:100). Samples were taken from the total virus yield from each system at 15, 18, 21, and 24 h post-inoculation. Testing the total virus yield infectivity through virus titration and antigenicity through estimation of complement fixing titer and 146S content and evaluation of the potency of the vaccine prepared from the different cultivation systems were done.

Results: The results showed that the FMDV titer of serotype A, O, and SAT-2 obtained from the roller cultivation system showed the highest level followed by suspension cultivation system then the rawx cultivation system. The FMDV titer showed its highest level at 21 h post-inoculation in all the cultivation systems and then decline at 24 h post-inoculation. The antigenicity reached its highest value content at 18 h post-inoculation either by complement fixation test or by quantifying the 146S intact virion. Montanide ISA 206 oil inactivated trivalent vaccines were prepared from the tested serotypes (A Iran O5. O Panasia and SAT-2/EGY/2012) harvested at 18 h post-inoculation from the 3 culture systems. The results of tracing the antibody response showed that the mean antibody response from the roller cultivation system start its protective antibody titer earlier at 2 weeks post-vaccination (WPV) than the vaccine prepared from the other two cultivation system and the immune protection period lasts longer for 36 WPV for the roller cultivation system vaccine than the other two cultivation systems.

Conclusion: The best cultivation system used for the production of FMD vaccine regarding its highest infectivity and antigenicity is the roller system.

Keywords: baby hamster kidney-21 cell culture, foot and mouth disease virus, monolayer tissue culture cells, suspension tissue culture cells.



1. Depa, P.M., Dimri, U., Sharma, M.C. and Tiwari, R. (2012) Update on epidemiology and control of foot and mouth disease - A menace to international trade and global animal enterprise. Vet. World, 5(11): 694-704.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/vetworld.2012.693-703
 
2. Longjam, N., Deb, R., Sarmah, A.K., Tayo, T., Awachat, V.B. and Saxena, V.K. (2011) A brief review on diagnosis of foot and- mouth disease of livestock: Conventional to molecular tools. Vet. Med. Int., 2011: 905768.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4061/2011/905768
 
3. Rowland, R. (2003) Foot and Mouth Disease. Elsevier Australia. p1.
 
4. Grubman, MJ, and Baxt, B. (2004) Foot-and-mouth disease. Clin. Microbiol. Rev., 17: 465-493.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/CMR.17.2.465-493.2004
PMid:15084510 PMCid:PMC387408
 
5. Guzman, E, Taylor, G, Charleson, B, Skinner, M.A. and Ellis, S.A. (2008) An MHC restricted CD8+ T-cell response is induced in cattle by Foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) infection and also following vaccination with inactivated FMDV. J. Genviro1., 89: 667-675.
 
6. Aidaros, H.A. (2002) Regional status and approaches to control and eradication of FMD in the Middle East and North Africa. Rev. Sci. Tech. Off. Int. Epizoot., 21(3): 451-458.
 
7. Farag, M.A., Aggour, M.A. and Daoud, A.M (2005) ELISA as a rapid method for detecting the correlation between the field isolates of Foot and Mouth Disease and the current used vaccine strain in Egypt. Vet. Med. J. Giza. Vol., 53(4): 949-955.
 
8. Parida, S. (2009) Vaccination against foot‑and‑mouth disease virus: Strategies and effectiveness Expert Rev. Vaccines, 8(3): 347-365.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1586/14760584.8.3.347
 
9. Abd El- Rahman, A.O., Farag, M.A., El- Kilany, S., Ali, S.M. and Yazed, M.A. (2006) Isolation and Identification of Serotype O of Foot and Mouth Disease Virus from Imported Bulls and its Correlation to the Current used Vaccine Strain O1/3/1993. Proceeding 3rd International Conference Veterinary Research Division, NRC, Cairo, Egypt. p91-100.
 
10. Abd El-Aty, S.M., Hiam, M.F., Hind, M.D., El-Sayed, E.I., Wael Mossad, G., Rizk, S.A., Abu-El-Naga, H., Mohamed, A.A., El-Kreem, A.A. and Farouk, E.M. (2013) Isolation and molecular characterization of foot and mouth disease SAT2 virus during outbreak 2012 in Egypt. J. Vet. Adv., 3(2): 60-68.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/jva.20130219104353
 
11. Gamal, W.M., Soliman, E.M.M. and El-Manzalawy, M.A. (2014) Tracing the antibody mediated acquired immunity by foot and mouth disease and rift valley fever combined vaccine in pregnant ewes and their lambs. Vet. World, 7(11): 922-928.
http://dx.doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2014.922-928
 
12. Abd El-Karim, A.S., Ebeid, M.H.B., Ibrahim, F.K. and Azab, A.M. (2011) Field application of bivalent inactivated foot and mouth disease vaccine adjuvanted by ISA 206. 4th Sci. Conf., Al-Kasr 25-28 May, 2011 Benha Vet. Med. J.,Special Issue[1]:82-87.
 
13. Neeta, L, Rajib, D., Sarmah, A.K., Tilling, T., Awachat, V.B. and Saxena, V.K. (2011) A brief review on diagnosis of foot-and-mouth disease of livestock: Conventional to molecular tools. Vet. Med. Int., 2011: Article ID 905768. DOI:10.4061/2011/905768.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4061/2011/905768
 
14. Huang, X., Yong, L., Hui, F. and Congyi, Z. (2011) Establishment of persistent infection with foot and mouth disease virus in BHK-21 cells. Virol. J., 8: 169.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-422X-8-169
PMid:21492421 PMCid:PMC3097150
 
15. Guo, H.C., Jin, Y., Han, S.C., Sun, S.Q., Wei, Y.Q., Liu, X.J., Feng, X., Liu, D.X., Liu, X.T. (2015) Quantitative proteomic analysis of BHK-21 cells infected with foot-and-mouth disease virus serotype Asia 1. PLoS One, 10(7): e0132384.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132384
 
16. Daoud, H.M., Ibrahim, E.E., El-Din, W.M.G., Hassanin, A.I.H. (2013) Preparation of foot and mouth disease trivalent vaccine type A, O, SAT2 and determination of the Guinea pig protective dose 50 (GPPD). Vet. World, 6(11): 844-851.
http://dx.doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2013.844-851
 
17. Shabana, W. (2014) Preparation of combined oil vaccine against foot and mouth disease and rift valley fever in sheep. Ph.D. Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University.
 
18. Alhaji, S. (2011) A modified arithmetical method of Reed and Muench for determination of a relatively ideal median lethal dose LD50. Afr. J. Pharm. Pharmacol., 5(12): 1543-1546.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5897/AJPP11.393
 
19. Health Protection Agency. (2009) Complement Fixation Tests. Issue no: 3 Issue date 11.12.09 Issued by: Standards Unit, Department for Evaluations, Standards and Training. 1 - 23 .
 
20. Bartelling, A.S.J., Van Maanan, C., Yadin, H. and Anemaet, D.A.J. (1990) A foot and mouth disease vaccine bank; purified inactivated antigen stored at ultra-low temperatures for the rapid preparation of double oil emulsion vaccines. European Commission for Control of Foot and Mouth Disease. Session of Research Group of the Standing Technical Committee, Lindholm. p172-177.
 
21. Gamil, M.A. (2010) Studies on the immune response of calves vaccinated inactivated bivalent FMD virus vaccine type O/1 and A/Egypt 2006. MVSC in Veterinary Science (Virology). Benha University.
PMCid:PMC2880377
 
22. Ferreira, M.E.V. 1976. Microtitre neutralization test for the study of FMD antibodies. Bol. Centro Pan Americano de Fiebre aftosa 21: 22-23.
 
23. Ali, S.M., Ismail, A.H., Soliman, E.M. and Mostafa, H.A. (2013) Studies on growth kinetics of the FMDV serotype SAT-2 Egyptian strain in cell culture. J. Vet. Adv., 3(2): 92-97.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/jva.20130221053913
 
24. Akram, Q., Muhammad, K., Rabbani, M., Nazir J., Nawaz, M., Hanif, K. and Shakoor, Z. (2013) Augmentation of biological titer of foot and mouth disease virus in in vitro cultures. J. Anim. Plant Sci., 23(3): 771-774.
 
25. Altaf, I., Saddique, M., Irshad, M., Khan, M.Z., Anjum, A.A. and Kamran, M. (2012) Antibody response of rabbits to combined hemorrhagic septicemia and foot and mouth disease virus vaccine. J. Anim. Plant Sci., 22(2): 501-504.
 
26. Khawaja, R.M., Muhammad, K., Shahzad, W., Hussain, I., Choudhry, Z.I., Awan, F.N., Bukhari, A., Altaf, I. and Hanif, A. (2009) Isolation, adaptation and sero-typing of local strains of foot and mouth disease virus Pakistan. J. Zool., 9: 173-177.
 
27. Salivac, I., Srček, V.G., Radošević, K., Kmetič, I. and Kniewald, Z. (2006) Aujeszky's disease virus production in disposable bioreactor. J. Bio sci., 31: 363-368.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02704109
 
28. Ali, S.M. (2009) Kinetic studies on the sensitivity and susceptibility of BHK21 cells to replication of FMD Serotype (A) Isolated from Egypt Outbreak 2006. 6th Science Conference of Mansoura, Faculty of Mansoura. p929-938.
 
29. OIE. (2013) OIE/FAO Foot-and-Mouth Disease Reference Laboratory Network, Annual Report 2013.