Veterinary World

     Open access and peer reviewed journal  

ISSN (Online): 2231-0916

 

Home l Editorial board l Instructions for authors l Reviewer guideline l Open access policy l Archives l FAQ


Open Access


Research (Published online: 24-05-2016)

11. Estimation of metabolic heat production and methane emission in Sahiwal and Karan Fries heifers under different feeding regimes - Sunil Kumar, S. V. Singh, Priyanka Pandey, Narendra Kumar and O. K. Hooda

Veterinary World, 9(5): 496-500

 

 

   doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2016.496-500

 

 

Sunil Kumar: Dairy Cattle Physiology Division, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana, India; dr.sunil8507@gmail.com

S. V. Singh: Dairy Cattle Physiology Division, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana, India; sohanvir2011@gmail.com

Priyanka Pandey: Dairy Cattle Physiology Division, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana, India; drpriyankapandey12@gmail.com

Narendra Kumar: Livestock Production and Management Division, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana, India; narendrakumarvet@gmail.com

O. K. Hooda: Dairy Cattle Physiology Division, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana, India; hoodaomkanwar1@gmail.com

 

Received: 16-01-2016, Accepted: 12-04-2016, Published online: 24-05-2016

 

Corresponding author: Sunil Kumar, e-mail: dr.sunil8507@gmail.com


Citation: Kumar S, Singh SV, Pandey P, Kumar N, Hooda OK (2016) Estimation of metabolic heat production and methane emission in Sahiwal and Karan Fries heifers under different feeding regimes, Veterinary World, 9(5): 496-500.



Aim: The objective of this study was designed to estimate the metabolic heat production and methane emission in Sahiwal and Karan Fries (Holstein-Friesian X Tharparkar) heifers under two different feeding regimes, i.e., feeding regime-1 as per the National Research Council (NRC) (2001) and feeding regime-2 having 15% higher energy (supplementation of molasses) than NRC (2001).

Materials and Methods: Six (n = 6) healthy heifers of Sahiwal and Karan Fries with 18-24 months of age were selected from Indian Council of Agricultural Research-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal. An initial 15 days was maintained under feeding regime-1 and feeding regime-2 as adaptation period; actual experiment was conducted from 16th day onward for next 15 days. At the end of feeding regimes (on day 15th and 16th), expired air and volume were collected in Douglas bag for two consecutive days (morning [6:00 am] and evening [4:00 pm]). The fraction of methane and expired air volume were measured by methane analyzer and wet test meter, respectively. The oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide production were measured by iWorx LabScribe2.

Results: The heat production (kcal/day) was significantly (p<0.05) higher in feeding regime-2 as compared to feeding regimen-1 in both breeds. The heat production per unit metabolic body weight was numerically higher in feeding regime-1 than feeding regime-2; however, the values were found statistically non-significant (p>0.05). The energy loss as methane (%) from total heat production was significantly (p<0.05) higher in feeding regime-1. The body weight (kg), metabolic body weight (W0.75), and basal metabolic rate (kcal/kg0.75) were significantly (p<0.05) higher in feeding regime-2 in both breeds.

Conclusions: This study indicates that higher energy diet by supplementing molasses may reduce energy loss as methane and enhance the growth of Sahiwal and Karan Fries heifers.

Keywords: feeding regimes, heat production, Karan Fries, methane emission, Sahiwal.



1. Blaxter, K. (1989) Energy Metabolism in Animals and Man. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
PMCid:PMC1190565
 
2. Staerfl, S.M., Zeitz, J.O., Kreuzer, M. and Soliva, C.R. (2012) Methane conversion rate of bulls fattened on grass or maize silage as compared with the IPCC default values, and the long-term methane mitigation efficiency of adding acacia tannin, garlic, maca and lupine. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 148: 111-120.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2011.11.003
 
3. Tangjitwattanachai, N., Phaowphaisal, I., Otsuka, M. and Sommart, K. (2015) Enteric methane emission, energetic efficiency and energy requirements for the maintenance of beef cattle in the tropics. Jpn. Agric. Res. Q., 49(4): 399-407.
http://dx.doi.org/10.6090/jarq.49.399
 
4. Chagunda, M.G.G. (2013) Opportunity and challenges in the use of the laser methane detector or monitor enteric methane emission from ruminants. Anim. Consort. Anim., 7(52): 392-400.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1751731113000724
 
5. Phromloungsri, A., Hayashi, K., Otsuka, M., Udchachon, S. and Sommart, K. (2012) Effects of energy intake level on methane production of Thai native and Brahaman crossbred cattle. Khon Kaen Agric. J., 40: 5-11.
 
6. Johnson, K.A. and Johnson, D.E. (1995) Methane emissions from cattle. J. Anim. Sci., 73: 2483-2492.
PMid:8567486
 
7. National Research Council. (2001) Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. 7th Rev. ed. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC.
 
8. Brouwer, E. (1964) Report of sub - Committee on constant and factors. In Energy metabolism. In: Blaxter, K.L., editor. European Association for Animal Production Publication No. 11. p441-443.
 
9. SAS, Institute. (2011) Statistical Analysis System. Version 9.1. SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA.
 
10. Chaokaur, A., Nishida, T., Phaowphaisal, I. and Sommart, K. (2015) Effects of feeding level on methane emission and energy utilization of Brahman cattle in the tropics. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 199: 225-230.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2014.09.014
 
11. Tiwari, C.M., Jadhao, S.B. and Khan, M.Y. (2000) Fasting heat production of growing buffalo calves. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci., 13(3): 307-312.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2000.307
 
12. Sauvant, D. and Giger-Reverdin, S. (2007) Empirical modeling by meta-analysis of digestive interactions and CH4 production in ruminants. In: Ortigues-Marty, I., Miraux, N., Brand-Williams, W., editors. Energy and Protein Metabolism and Nutrition. EAAP Publication No. 124. Wageningen Academic Publication, Wageningen, The Netherlands, p561-562.
 
13. Gerber, P.J., Steinfeld, H., Henderson, B., Mottet, A., Opio, C., Dijkman, J., Falcucci, A. and Tempio, G. (2013) Tackling Climate Change Through Livestock – A Global Assessment of Emissions and Mitigation Opportunities. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome.
 
14. Hammond, K.J., Humphhries, D.J., Westbury, D.B., Thompson, A., Crompton, L.A., Kirton, P., Green, C. and Reynolds, C.K. (2014) The inclusion of forage mixture in the diet of growing dairy heifers: Impacts on digestion, energy utilization and methane emissions. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 197: 88-95.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2014.07.016
 
15. Blaxter, K.L. and Clapperton, J.L. (1965) Prediction of the amount of methane produced by ruminants. Br. J. Nutr., 19: 511-522.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/BJN19650046
PMid:5852118