Veterinary World

     Open access and peer reviewed journal  

ISSN (Online): 2231-0916

 

Home l Editorial board l Instructions for authors l Reviewer guideline l Open access policy l Archives l FAQ


Open Access


Research (Published online: 26-09-2016)

16. Genetic evaluation of reproduction performance of Jersey × Red Sindhi crossbred cows - S. Vinothraj, A. Subramaniyan, R. Venkataramanan, Cecilia Joseph and S. N. Sivaselvam

Veterinary World, 9(9): 1012-1017

 

 

   doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2016.1012-1017

 

 

S. Vinothraj: Department of Animal Genetics and Breeding, Madras Veterinary College, Vepery, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India; vinothen90@gmail.com

A. Subramaniyan: Department of Animal Genetics and Breeding, Madras Veterinary College, Vepery, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India; drsubbuni@yahoo.com

R. Venkataramanan: Department of Animal Genetics and Breeding, Post-graduate Research Institute in Animal Sciences, Kattupakkam - 603 203, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India; venkyvet@gmail.com

Cecilia Joseph: Department of ARGO, Madras Veterinary College, Vepery, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India; drceciliajoseph@yahoo.com

S. N. Sivaselvam: Department of Animal Genetics and Breeding, Madras Veterinary College, Vepery, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India; snsivaselvam@hotmail.com

 

Received: 06-03-2016, Accepted: 13-08-2016, Published online: 26-09-2016

 

Corresponding author: R. Venkataramanan, e-mail: venkyvet@gmail.com


Citation: Vinothraj S, Subramaniyan A, Venkataramanan R, Joseph C, Sivaselvam SN (2016) Genetic evaluation of reproduction performance of Jersey × Red Sindhi crossbred cows, Veterinary World, 9(9): 1012-1017.



Aim: The present investigation was undertaken to study the reproduction performance and effect of non-genetic factors on reproduction performance of Jersey crossbred cows.

Materials and Methods: Data on 355 Jersey crossbred cattle maintained at the Post-graduate Research Institute in Animal Sciences, Kattupakkam, Tamil Nadu, distributed over 30 years (1985 to 2014). The effect of various non-genetic factors including the period of birth, season of birth, period of calving, season of calving and parity were analyzed through least-squares analyses using univariate general linear model. The different (co)variance components for calculation of genetic parameters were estimated using restricted maximum likelihood method by fitting an animal model.

Results: The overall least-squares means (±standard error) of age at first service, age at first calving, weight at first calving, service period, calving interval, dry period, and number of services per conception were 848.06±9.72 days, 1204±12.20 days, 289.81±1.71 kg, 210.01±6.41 days, 489.12±6.45 days, 137.96±5.58 days, 2.50±0.07, respectively. Period of calving had either significant (p<0.05) or highly significant (p<0.01) effect on all reproduction traits studied except service period, calving interval, and dry period. Number of services per conception was affected by season of calving. Parity had significant influence (p<0.05) or highly significant (p<0.01) influence on all the traits studied except service period and dry period. Heritability estimates of age at first service, age at first calving, weight at first calving, service period, calving interval, dry period, and number of services per conception were 0.299, 0.220, 0.017, 0.142, 0.222, 0.177, and 0.042, respectively. The estimates of repeatability for service period, calving interval, dry period, and number of services per conception were 0.219, 0.234, 0.420, and 0.001, respectively.

Conclusions: The reproduction performances of Jersey × Red Sindhi crossbreds were lower when compared to the earlier reports on Jersey crossbreds. Heritability and repeatability values were also low to moderate, indicating limited scope for improvement through selection.

Keywords: genetic parameters, Jersey crossbred, reproductive performance.



1. 19 Livestock Census. (2012) Salient Features of 19th Livestock Census. Ministry of Agriculture Department of Animal Husbandry, Dairying and Fisheries Krishi Bhawan, New Delhi, India.
 
2. Varaprasad, A.R., Raghunandan, T., Kumar, M.K. and Prakash, M.G. (2013) Studies on the reproductive performance of Jersey x Sahiwal cows in Chittoor district of Andhra Pradesh. Int. J. Agric. Sci. Vet. Med., 1(1): 52-57.
 
3. Rahumathulla, P.S., Natarajan, N., Edwin, M.J., Sivaselvam, S.N., Subramanian, A. and Khan, M.M.H. (1994) Studies on first lactation traits in Jersey x Tharparker cows. Cheiron, 23(1): 1-8.
 
4. Demeke, S., Neser, F.W.C. and Schoeman, S.J. (2004) Estimates of genetic parameters for Boran, Friesian and crosses of Friesian and Jersey with the Boran cattle in the tropical highlands of Ethiopia: Reproduction traits. J. Anim. Breed. Genet., 121: 57-65.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.0931-2668.2003.00438.x
 
5. Akhtar, M., Javed, K., Jarral, Z.A. and Khan, S.A. (2008) Environmental factors affecting performance traits of crossbred and local dairy cows at Mirpur Azad Jammu and Kashmir. Pak. J. Agric. Res., 45(2): 362-371.
 
6. Subramanian, A. and Ulaganathan, V. (1990) Effect of parity and environment on milk yield in crossbred cows. Cheiron, 19(4): 153-155.
 
7. Banda, J.W. (1996) Evaluation of the productive and reproductive performance of Friesian x Zebu and Jersey x Zebu crossbred cattle at Bunda College farm in Malawi. Malawi J. Sci. Technol., 3: 25-35.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/mjst.v3i1.18059
 
8. Hadge, M.R., Kuralkar, S.V., Ali, S.Z., Kharkar, K.P. and Sawaimul, A.D. (2012) Genetic studies on productive traits of Sahiwal and Sahiwal x Jersey crossbred cows. Indian J. Anim. Res., 46(1): 92-94.
 
9. Maurya, P.R. and Saraswat, B.L. (2008) Performance of Jersey x Gangatiri crossbred cows over different lactation. J. Agric. Res., 8(2): 37-39.
 
10. Hussain, J., Roychoudhury, R., Das, G.C., Mili, D.C. and Goswami, R.N. (2012) Reproductive performance of dairy cows under field condition of Assam state. Indian J. Anim. Res., 46(2): 180-183.
 
11. Mondal, S.C., Alam, M.M., Rashid, M.M., Ali, M.Y. and Hossai, M.M. (2005) Comparative study on the different dairy genotypes reared in Bangladesh Agricultural University Dairy Farm. Pak. J. Nutr., 4(4): 222-225.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2005.222.225
 
12. Haider, I., Zaman, M., Farooq, M.A. and Karamshak, S. (1984) Productive and reproductive performance of crossbred cows under sub-tropical environmental conditions of the Punjab. Pak. J. Agric. Res., 5(3): 190-197.
 
13. Haque, M.N., Haque, M.R., Parvin, A. and Hussain, M.M. (2011) Productive and reproductive performance of different crossbred cattle at Sylhet Govt. Dairy Farm. Prog. Agric., 22(1 & 2): 47-54.
 
14. Singh, P.K., Kumar, D. and Varma, S.K. (2004) Genetic studies and development of prediction equations in Jersey x Sahiwal and Holstein-Friesian half breds. Asian Aust. J. Anim. Sci., 18(2): 179-184.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2005.179
 
15. Bajetha, G. and Singh, C.V. (2011) Estimates of genetic and phenotypic parameters of first lactation and lifetime performance traits in crossbred cattle. Indian J. Dairy Sci., 64(6): 494-500.
 
16. Dubey, P.P. and Singh, C.V. (2005) Estimates of genetic and phenotypic parameters considering first lactation performance traits in Sahiwal cattle and crossbred cattle. Indian J. Anim. Sci., 75(11): 1289-1294.
 
17. Kumar, J., Singh, Y.P., Kumar, S., Singh, R., Kumar, R and Kumar, P. (2015) Genetic analysis of reproductive performance of Frieswal cattle at Military farm, Ambala. Vet. World, 8: 1032-1037.
http://dx.doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2015.1032-1037
PMid:27047194 PMCid:PMC4774768
 
18. Cavani, L., Garcia, D.A., Carren, L.O.D., Ono, R.K., Pires, M.P., Farah, M.M., Ventura, H.T., Millen, D.D. and Fonseca, R. (2015) Estimates of genetic parameters for reproductive traits in Brahman cattle breed. J. Anim. Sci., 93: 3287-3291.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/jas.2015-8970
PMid:26439997
 
19. Khan, U.N., Benyshek, L.L. and Ahmad, M.D. (1988) Repeatability and heritability estimates for economic traits of native and Jersey crossbred dairy cattle. Pak. J. Agric. Res., 9(4): 575-579.