Veterinary World

     Open access and peer reviewed journal  

ISSN (Online): 2231-0916

 

Home l Editorial board l Instructions for authors l Reviewer guideline l Open access policy l Archives l FAQ


Open Access


Research (Published online: 30-09-2016)

21. Comparative evaluation of polymerase chain reaction assay with microscopy for detection of asymptomatic carrier state of theileriosis in a herd of crossbred cattle - Gaurav Charaya, N. K. Rakha, Sushila Maan, Aman Kumar, Tarun Kumar and Ricky Jhambh

Veterinary World, 9(9): 1039-1042

 

 

   doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2016.1039-1042

 

 

Gaurav Charaya: Department of Veterinary Medicine, Lala Lajpat Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Hisar, Haryana, India; gcharaya9@gmail.com

N. K. Rakha: Department of Veterinary Medicine, Lala Lajpat Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Hisar, Haryana, India; drrakha@gmail.com

Sushila Maan: Department of Animal Biotechnology, Lala Lajpat Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Hisar, Haryana, India; sushilamaan105@gmail.com

Aman Kumar: Department of Animal Biotechnology, Lala Lajpat Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Hisar, Haryana, India; aman.abt@luvas.edu.in

Tarun Kumar: Teaching Veterinary Clinical Complex, Lala Lajpat Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Hisar, Haryana, India; tarunvet@gmail.com

Ricky Jhambh: Department of Veterinary Medicine, Lala Lajpat Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Hisar, Haryana, India; jhambricky@gmail.com

 

Received: 05-05-2016, Accepted: 18-08-2016, Published online: 30-09-2016

 

Corresponding author: N. K. Rakha, e-mail: drrakha@gmail.com


Citation: Charaya G, Rakha NK, Maan S, Kumar A, Kumar T, Jhambh R (2016) Comparative evaluation of polymerase chain reaction assay with microscopy for detection of asymptomatic carrier state of theileriosis in a herd of crossbred cattle, Veterinary World, 9(9): 1039-1042.



Aim: This study aims to develop and to standardize a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay that will diagnose clinical as well as carrier state of the disease and to compare the results with conventional microscopy technique.

Materials and Methods: A herd of crossbred cattle with the previous history of theileriosis in village Lahli, district Rohtak, Haryana, was selected for this study. A total of 29 blood samples were collected randomly from cows including five clinically ill cattle. Blood smears from all animals and lymph node biopsy smears from animal with swollen lymph nodes were examined microscopically after conventional Giemsa staining. Phenol chloroform isoamyl alcohol method was used for extracting DNA from blood. Previously published primers targeting cytochrome b gene sequence of Theileria annulata were used in the PCR assay that was standardized to use in the laboratory.

Results: Out of 29 samples tested,18 (62.06%) were found positive for theileriosis by PCR assay, whereas only 10 (34.48%) samples were detected positive by conventional microscopic technique using Giemsa staining method.

Conclusions: On the basis results of comparative studies, it can be concluded that PCR assay is a more sensitive than microscopic examination for detection of theileriosis. This can be attributed to the ability of PCR assay to detect small amounts of genomic DNA of T. annulata or low parasitemia in cows. Therefore, PCR assay can serve as a more sensitive tool to detect Theileria for detection of theileriosis even in asymptomatic carrier cattle which is important for the implementation of successful control programs.

Keywords: Carrier state, cytochrome b, Giemsa staining, polymerase chain reaction assay, theileriosis, Theileria annulata.



1. Cacci, S., Camma, C., Onuma, M. andSeverini, C. (2000) The b-tubulin gene of Babesia and Theileria parasites is an informative marker for species discrimination. Int. J.Parasitol., 30:1181-1185.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7519(00)00105-3
 
2. Kirvar, E., Ilhan, T., Katzer, F., Hooshmand-Rad, E., Zweygarth, C., Gerstenberg, P.P. and Brown, C.G. (2000) Detection of Theileria annulata in cattle and vector ticks by PCR. Parasitology, 120(3): 245-254.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0031182099005466
 
3. Friedhoff, K. and Bose, R. (1994) Recent developments in diagnostics of some tick-borne diseases. In: Uilenberg, G., Permin, A.and Hansen, J.W., editors.Use of Applicable Biotechnological Methods for Diagnosing Haemoparasites. Proceedings of the Expert Consultation, Merida, Mexico, Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO), Rome, Italy.p46-57.
 
4. Altay, K., Aydın, M.F., Dumanli, N. andAktas, M. (2008) Molecular detection of Theileria and Babesia infections in cattle. Vet.Parasitol., 158:295-301.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.09.025
PMid:19008048
 
5. Benjamin, M. (1978) Outline of Veterinary Clinical Pathology. 3rded. The Iowa State University, Press, Ames, Iowa, U.S.A. p51-53.
 
6. Bilgic, H.B., Karagenc, T., Shiels, B., Tait,A., Eren, H. and Weir,W. (2010) Evaluation of cytochrome b as a sensitive target for PCR based detection of T. annulata carrier animals. Vet. Parasitol., 174: 341-347.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.08.025
PMid:20880635
 
7. Salih, D.A., Hassan, S.M. and El Hussein, A.M. (2007) Comparisons among two serological tests and microscopic examination for the detection of Theileria annulata cattle in Northern Sudan. Prev. Vet. Med., 81:323-326.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2007.05.008
PMid:17590458
 
8. Shayan, P. and Rahbari, S. (2005) Simultaneous differentiation between Theileria sp. and Babesia sp. on stained blood smear using PCR. Parasitol. Res., 97:281-286.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00436-005-1434-3
PMid:16007464
 
9. Noaman, V. (2014) Comparison of molecular and microscopic technique for detection of Theileria spp. in carrier cattle. J. Parasit. Dis., 38(1): 64-67.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12639-012-0196-y
PMid:24505180 PMCid:PMC3909596
 
10. Nayel, M., El-Dakhly, K.M., Aboulaila, M., Elsify, A., Hassan, H., Ibrahim, E., Salama, A. and Yanai, T. (2012) The use of different diagnostic tools for Babesia and Theileria parasites in cattle in Menoufia, Egypt. Parasitol. Res., 111(3):1019-1024.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00436-012-2926-6
PMid:22543747
 
11. Hoghooghi-Rad, N., Ghaemi, P. and Shayan, P. (2011) Detection of native carrier cattle infected with Theileria annulata by seminested PCR and smear method in Golestan province of Iran. World Appl. Sci. J., 12(3): 317-323.
 
12. Chauhan, H.C., Patel, B.K., Bhagat, A.G., Patel, M.V., Patel, S.I., Raval, S.H., Panchasara, H.H., Shrimali, M.D., Patel, A.C. and Chandel, B.S. (2015) Comparison of molecular and microscopic technique for detection of Theileria annulata from the field cases of cattle.Vet. World, 8(11): 1370-1374.
http://dx.doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2015.1370-1374
PMid:27047045 PMCid:PMC4774753
 
13. Roy, K.C., Ray, D., Bansal, G.C. and Singh, R.K. (2000) Detection of Theileria annulata carrier cattle by PCR. Indian J. Exp. Biol., 38: 283-284.
PMid:10927875
 
14. Kohli, S., Atheya, U.K. and Thapliyal, A. (2014) Prevalence of theileriosis in cross-bred cattle: Its detection through blood smear examination and polymerase chain reaction in Dehradun district, Uttarakhand, India. Vet. World, 7(3): 168-171.
http://dx.doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2014.168-171
 
15. Azizi, H., Shiran, B., Farzaneh, D.A., Salehi, F. and Taghadosi, C. (2008) Detection of Theileria annulata by PCR and its comparison with smear method in native carrier cows. Biotechnology, 79(3): 574-577.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/biotech.2008.574.577