Open Access
Research (Published online: 20-12-2018)
11. Effect of different smoking methods on the quality of pork sausages
Debajit Bhuyan, Ankur Das, Saurabh Kumar Laskar, Durlav Prasad Bora, Shantanu Tamuli, and Mineswar Hazarika
Veterinary World, 11(12): 1712-1719

Debajit Bhuyan: Department of Livestock Products Technology, College of Veterinary Science, Assam Agricultural University, Khanapara, Guwahati - 781 022, Assam, India.
Ankur Das: Department of Livestock Products Technology, College of Veterinary Science, Assam Agricultural University, Khanapara, Guwahati - 781 022, Assam, India.
Saurabh Kumar Laskar: Department of Livestock Products Technology, College of Veterinary Science, Assam Agricultural University, Khanapara, Guwahati - 781 022, Assam, India.
Durlav Prasad Bora: Department of Veterinary Microbiology, College of Veterinary Science, Assam Agricultural University, Khanapara, Guwahati - 781 022, Assam, India.
Shantanu Tamuli: Department of Veterinary Biochemistry, College of Veterinary Science, Assam Agricultural University, Khanapara, Guwahati - 781 022, Assam, India.
Mineswar Hazarika: Department of Livestock Products Technology, College of Veterinary Science, Assam Agricultural University, Khanapara, Guwahati - 781 022, Assam, India.

doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2018.1712-1719

Share this article on [Facebook] [LinkedIn]

Article history: Received: 13-08-2018, Accepted: 09-11-2018, Published online: 20-12-2018

Corresponding author: Ankur Das

E-mail: drankur1978@gmail.com

Citation: Bhuyan D, Das A, Laskar SK, Bora DP, Tamuli S, Hazarika M (2018) Effect of different smoking methods on the quality of pork sausages, Veterinary World, 11(12): 1712-1719.
Abstract

Aim: An experiment was conducted to evaluate the nutritional, physicochemical, microbiological, and sensory attributes of pork sausages treated with conventional smoking (CS) and liquid smoke (LS).

Materials and Methods: Pork sausages were prepared by employing CS (T1) and by addition of LS at 3% (T2A), 5% (T2B), and 7% (T2C) while smoking was not done in control (C) sausages. The ready-to-eat pork sausages were evaluated in terms of proximate composition, emulsion stability (ES), cooking loss (CL), pH, water activity (aw), texture profile analysis (TPA), and shear force on the day of preparation and the shelf life of the sausages was evaluated on the basis of thiobarbituric acid reactive substance (TBARS) value, organoleptic qualities, total viable plate count, total psychrophilic count, and yeast and mold counts at 5-day interval up to 15 days under refrigerated storage (6±1°C).

Results: The mean percentage moisture and percentage ether extract contents of the conventionally smoked sausages (T1) exhibited significant difference (p≤0.01) with the rest of the formulations. However, in terms of mean percentage crude protein and percentage total solids, no significant difference (p≥0.05) was recorded between the treatment groups. The mean ES (ml of oil/100 g emulsion) of the different sausage emulsions ranged from 1.88 to 3.20, while the mean aw values among the sausage formulations were found to be non-significant. In terms of mean percentage, CL and pH values, significantly lowest (p≤0.01) values were recorded by the T1 sausages. The mean TBARS values recorded at different periods of time in respect of all the treatment groups ranged from 0.10 to 0.33 mg malanoldehyde [MDA]/kg of sausages which are well within the permissible limit. The highest shear force values (KgF) were recorded by the sausages of T1 formulation (p≤0.01), while TPA of the sausages did not record any significant difference (p≥0.05) among the treatments. Organoleptic studies revealed acceptability of the sausages up to 10 days of refrigerated storage irrespective of treatments employed; however, the sausages of T1 formulation scored significantly (p≤0.01) higher panel ratings. Microbiologically, sausages with different formulations were found to be within the acceptable limit up to the 15th day of refrigerated storage.

Conclusion: The study revealed that traditional hot smoking has slightly higher edges over the LS-treated sausages in terms of lipid oxidation, microbiological safety, and sensory panel ratings. However, if not superior, the same was found to be well within the acceptable limit in case of LS-treated sausages proving the potentiality of the use of LS as a suitable replacement for the traditional hazardous hot smoking process.

Keywords: liquid smoke, pork sausage, quality attributes, smoking.

References

1. Pohlmann, M., Hitzel, A., Schwagele, F., Speer, K. and Jira, W. (2012) Contents of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) and phenolic substances in frankfurter-type sausages depending on smoking conditions using glow smoke. Meat Sci., 90(1): 176-184. [Crossref] [PubMed]

2. Lingbeck, J.M., Cordero, P., O'Bryan, C.A., Johnson, M.G., Ricke, S.C. and Crandall, P.G. (2014) Functionality of liquid smoke as an all-natural antimicrobial in food preservation. Meat Sci., 97(2): 197-206. [Crossref] [PubMed]

3. Kim, H.W., Choi, J.H., Choi, Y.S., Kim, H.Y., Lee, M.A., Hwang, K.E., Song, D.H., Lee, J.W. and Kim, C.J. (2014) Effects of kimchi and smoking on quality characteristics and shelf life of cooked sausages prepared with irradiated pork. Meat Sci., 96(1): 548-553. [Crossref] [PubMed]

4. Akintola, S.L., Brown, A., Bakarel, A., Osowo, O.D. and Bello, B.O. (2013) Effects of hot smoking and sun drying processes on nutritional composition of giant tiger shrimp (Penaeus monodon, Fabricius, 1798). Pol. J. Food Nutr. Sci., 63(4): 227-237. [Crossref]

5. Montazeri, N., Oliveira, A.C.M., Himelbloom, B.H., Leigh, M.B. and Crapol, C.A. (2013) Chemical characterization of commercial liquid smoke products. Food Sci. Nutr., 1(1): 102-115. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]

6. Sander, L.C. and Wise, S.A. (1997) Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Structure Index. NIST Special Publication 922, NSPUE2. United States Department of Commerce Technology Administration, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD. p1-105. [Crossref]

7. Simko, P. (2002) Determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in smoked meat products and smoke flavouring food additives. J. Chromatogr. B, 770(1): 3-18. [Crossref]

8. Milly, P.J. (2003) Antimicrobial Properties of Liquid Smoke Fractions. Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Georgia; 2003.

9. FAO. (2012) Code of Practice for Fish and Fishery Products. 2nd ed. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.

10. AOAC. (1995) Official Methods of Analysis. 6th ed. Association Official Analytical Chemists International, Maryland, USA.

11. Mongale, C.W., Carpenter, J.A. and Reagan, J.O. (1985) The effects of soluble and insoluble components of beef skeletal muscle on the stability of meat batters. J. Food Quality, 8(2-3): 145. [Crossref]

12. El-Nashi, H.B., Fattah, A.F.A., Rahman, N.R.A. and El-Razik, M.M.A. (2015) Quality characteristics of beef sausage containing pomegranate peels during refrigerated storage. Ann. Agric. Sci., 60(2): 403-412. [Crossref]

13. Pippen, E.L., De Fremery, D., Limeweaver, H. and Hanson, H.L. (1965) Chicken broth flavour and pH. Poult. Sci., 44(3): 816. [Crossref] [PubMed]

14. Witte, V.C., Krause, G.F. and Barley, M.E. (1970) A new extraction method for determining 2-thiobarbituric acid values for pork and beef during storage. J. Food Sci., 35(5): 582. [Crossref]

15. Bratzler, L.J. (1971) In: Price, J.F. and Schoriewert, B.S., editors. Palatability Factors and Evaluation in Science of Meat Products. W. H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco. [PubMed]

16. Harrigan, W.E. and McCancy, M.E. (1976) Laboratory Methods in Food and Dairy Microbiology. ADV Press, London.

17. Yusnaini, Y., Soeparno, S., Suryanto, E. and Armunanto, R. (2012) Physical, chemical and sensory properties of kenari (Canariunindicum L.) Shell liquid smoke-immersed-beef on different level of dilution. J. Indones. Trop. Anim. Agric., 37(1): 27-33. [Crossref]

18. Swanepoel, M., Leslie, A.J. and Hoffman, L.C. (2016) Comparative analyses of the chemical and sensory parameters and consumer preference of a semi-dried smoked meat product (cabanossi) produced with warthog (Phacochoerus africanus) and domestic pork meat. Meat Sci., 114(1): 103-113. [Crossref] [PubMed]

19. Dharmaveer, S., Rajkumar, V. and Mukesh, K.P. (2007) Quality and shelf-life of smoked chevon sausages packed under vacuum. Am. J. Food Technol., 2(4): 238-247. [Crossref]

20. Choi, H.S., Choi, H.G., Choi, Y.S., Kim, J.H., Lee, J.H., Jung, E.H., Lee, S.H., Choi, Y.I. and Choi, J.S. (2016) Effect of chicory fiber and smoking on quality characteristics of restructured sausages. Korean J. Food Sci. Anim. Resour., 36(1): 131. [Crossref]

21. Ameko, E., Achio, S., Kutsanedzie, F., Abrokwah1, A. and Laar, D. (2014) Conversion of three types of waste biomass in Ghana (coconut shell, coconut husk and mahogany) into liquid smokes and determination of the sensory profiles. Int. J. Eng. Res. Technol., 3(12): 1107-1114.

22. Paul, P. and Bratzler, L.J. (1955) Studies on tenderness of beef. II. Varying storage times and conditions. Food Res., 20(6): 625. [Crossref]

23. Silins, I. and Liepins, E. (2011) The Microbiological Quality and Physiochemical Parameters of Cold-Smoked Sausages During Ripening. In: Conference Proceedings of the 6th Baltic Conference on Food Science and Technology FOODBALT-2011, Innovations for Food Science and Production. Latvia University of Agriculture, Faculty of Food Technology, Jelgava, Latvia. p182-186.

24. Deuri, D., Hazarika, P., Singh, T.P., Chhangte, L., Singh, P. and Talukder, S. (2016) Effect of curing ingredients and vacuum packaging on the physicochemical and storage quality of ready-to-eat vawksa rep (smoked pork product) during refrigerated storage. Vet. World, 9(6): 587-594. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]

25. Anandh, M.A., Venkatachalapathy, R.T., Radha, K. and Lakshmanan, V. (2014) Quality and shelf life of cooked buffalo tripe rolls at refrigerated storage under vacuum packaging condition. J. Food Sci. Technol., 51(7): 1370-1376. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]

26. Alkass, J.E., Baker, L.A. and Saleh, H.H. (2013) Reduction of oxidative rancidity and microbial activities of the karadilamb patties in freezing storage using natural antioxidant extracts of rosemary and ginger. Int. J. Agric. Food Res., 2(1): 31-42.

27. Schwert, R., Verlindo, R., Cichoski, A.J., Oliveira, D. and Valduga, E. (2011) Comparative evaluation of liquid and traditional smoke on oxidative stability, colour and sensory properties of Brazilian calabrese sausage. CyTA J. Food, 9(2): 131-134. [Crossref]

28. Awonorin, S.O. (1993) Quality of smoked chicken-guinea-fowl sausage as affected by processing conditions and cold storage. LWT Food Sci. Technol., 26(4): 285-290. [Crossref]

29. Martinez, O., Salmeron, J., Guillen, M.D. and Casas, C. (2004) Texture profile analysis of meat products treated with commercial liquid smoke flavourings. Food Control, 15(6): 457-461. [Crossref]

30. Arnim, F. and Marlida, Y. (2012) The effect of liquid smoke utilization as preservative for meatballs quality. Pak. J. Nutr., 11(11): 1078-1080. [Crossref]

31. Silva, F.A.P., Amaral, D.S., Guerra, I.C.D., Dalmas, P.S., Arcanjo, N.M.O., Bezerra, T.K.A., Filho, E.M.B., Moreira, R.T. and Madruga, M.S. (2013) The chemical and sensory qualities of smoked blood sausage made with the edible by-products of goat slaughter. Meat Sci., 94(1): 34-38. [Crossref] [PubMed]

32. Soares, J.M., da Silva, P.F., Puton, B.M.S., Brustolin, A.P., Cansian, R.L., Dallago, R.M. and Valduga, E. (2016) Antimicrobial and antioxidant activity of liquid smoke and its potential application to bacon. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol., 38(1): 189-197. [Crossref]

33. Jensen, L.B. (1943) Action of hardwood smoke on bacteria in cured meats. J. Food Sci., 8(5): 377-387. [Crossref]

34. Romans, J.R., Costello, W.J., Carlson, C.W., Greaser, M.L. and Jones, K.W. (2001) The Meat We Eat. 14th ed. Interstate Publication, Danville, IL. p779-887.

35. Ozer, E., Unlusayin, M. and Erdilal, R. (2012) Microbiological, physicochemical, and sensorial quality of vacuum-packed sausage from thornback ray (Raja clavata L., 1758) at chilled storage. J. Agroaliment. Process. Technol., 18(1): 1-7.

36. Morey, A., Bratcher, C.L., Singh, M. and McKee, S.R. (2012) Effect of liquid smoke as an ingredient in frankfurters on Listeria monocytogenes and quality attributes. Pol. Sci., 91(9): 2341-2350. [Crossref]

37. Jakobsen, L.M.A., Vuholm, S., Aaslyng, M.D., Kristensen, M., Sorensen, K.V., Raben, A. and Kehlet, U. (2014) Sensory characteristics and consumer liking of sausages with 10% fat and added rye or wheat bran. Food Sci. Nutr., 2(5): 534-546. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]

38. Tobin, B.D., O'Sullivan, M.G., Hamill, R.M. and Kerry, J.P. (2013) The impact of salt and fat level variation on the physiochemical properties and sensory quality of pork breakfast sausages. Meat Sci., 93(2): 145-152. [Crossref] [PubMed]

39. Choi, Y.S., Kim, H.W., Hwang, K.E., Song, D.H., Kim, Y.J., Jung, T.J., Kim, Y. and Kim, C.J. (2015) Optimizing the combination of smoking and boiling on quality of Korean traditional boiled loin (M. longissimusdorsi). Korean J. Food Sci. Anim Resour., 35(2): 149-155. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]