| 
              
              
              Open Access  
 
              
              
              
              Research 
              
              
(Published 
				online: 01-09-2016)  
              1. 
				
				
				Impacts of self- and cross-sucking on 
				cattle health and performance - 
				
				Motamed Elsayed Mahmoud, Fatma Ali Mahmoud and Adel Elsayed 
				Ahmed 
              
              Veterinary World, 9(9): 922-928   
              
   
                
                
doi: 
              
				
				10.14202/vetworld.2016.922-928 
                
				  
				
				Motamed Elsayed Mahmoud: 
				
				Department of Animal Behavior and Husbandry, Faculty of 
				Veterinary Medicine, Sohag University, 82524 Sohag, Egypt; 
				motamed71111@gmail.com 
				
				Fatma Ali Mahmoud: 
				
				Department of Animal Behavior and Husbandry, Faculty of 
				Veterinary Medicine, Sohag University, 82524 Sohag, Egypt; 
				ftm_abushanief@yahoo.com 
				
				Adel Elsayed Ahmed: 
				
				Department of Animal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, 
				South Valley University, Qena, Egypt; adelqena@lycos.com   
				
				Received: 20-04-2016, Accepted: 26-07-2016, Published online: 
				01-09-2016   
				
              	
              	Corresponding author: 
              	
				
				Motamed Elsayed Mahmoud, e-mail: motamed71111@gmail.com 
 
              Citation: 
				Mahmoud ME, Mahmoud FA, Ahmed AE (2016) Impacts of self- and 
				cross-sucking on cattle health and performance, 
				
				Veterinary World, 9(9): 
				922-928. 
 
              
				Abstract 
 
				
				
				Background: 
				
				Improvement of dairy farms economics requires intensification, 
				automatic milking, and artificial rearing methods. The ability 
				to express normal behavior is one of the five freedoms to 
				achieve animal welfare, whereas the display of abnormal 
				behaviors is considered as an indicator of poor welfare. 
				Cross-sucking is defined as sucking any body parts of pen-mate 
				calves, whereas inter-sucking in cows is defined as sucking the 
				udder or udder area. Previous studies showed that self- and 
				cross-sucking during the calf-hood period could be a causal 
				factor of milk sucking in adulthood. 
				
				
				Aim: 
				
				To investigate the effects of cross-sucking among calves and 
				inter-sucking in cows on animal health status and performance. 
				
				
				Materials and Methods: 
				
				Gathering information from customized questionnaires, the study 
				of the breeding records, recording of self- and cross-sucking 
				behaviors, and health status of calves till weaning, and dairy 
				cows before milking were performed in two governmental farms 
				under the same managemental conditions in Sohag and Qena 
				governorates. 
				
				
				Results: 
				
				Cross-sucking appeared in calves at the 2nd week of age followed 
				by abscesses at ears and navels that were observed within 
				cross-sucker calves. Milk sucking was higher in primiparous than 
				multiparous cows during the second lactation period, as 
				primiparous cows start to suck mostly around the 4th month of 
				milking. Mastitis and elongation of the front teats were 
				observed in sucker cows. Suffered animals had body condition 
				scoring 3.5 or less. Interestingly, most of the cows displaying 
				self-sucking were sucking another cow and were experienced self- 
				or cross-sucking in their calf-hood. The use of pronged 
				nose-rings was ineffective in preventing milk sucking and all 
				cows were ultimately culled at the end of the season. 
				
				
				Conclusion: 
				
				The results of this study demonstrate the health problems of 
				abnormal oral behaviors in terms of developed ears and navels 
				abscesses in cross-sucker calves, and mastitis and teat 
				deformities in milk-sucker cows. Furthermore, indexes that lead 
				to oral satisfaction should be taken in priorities of farm 
				managers to effectively reduce or prevent crosssucking in 
				calves. Culling of cows and heifers suffering from sucking would 
				be the ultimate uneconomic alternative in case of persistent 
				suckers. 
				
				Keywords: 
				
				animal welfare, culling, inter-sucking in cows, self-sucking in 
				calves, teat deformity. 
 
              References 
 
				
					| 1. Johnsen, J.F., de Passille, A.M., Mejdell, C.M., Bře, K.E., 
					Grřndahl, A.M., Beaver, A., Rushen, J. and Weary, D.M. 
					(2015) The effect of nursing on the cow - Calf bond. Appl. 
					Anim. Behav. Sci., 163; 50-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2014.12.003
 |  
					|  |  
					| 2. Khan, M.A., Weary, D.M. and von Keyserlingk, M.A.G. 
					(2011) Invited review: Effects of milk ration on solid feed 
					intake, weaning, and performance in dairy heifers. J. Dairy 
					Sci., 94: 1071-1081. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-3733
 |  
					|  |  
					| 3. Soberon, F., Raffrenato, E., Everett, R.W. and Van 
					Amburgh, M.E. (2012) Preweaning milk replacer intake and 
					effects on long-term productivity of dairy calves. J. Dairy 
					Sci., 95: 783-793. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-4391
 PMid:22281343
 |  
					|  |  
					| 4. David, I., Bouvier, F., Ricard, E., Ruesche, J. and 
					Weisbecker, J.L. (2014) Feeding behaviour of artificially 
					reared Romane lambs. Animal, 8: 982-990. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1751731114000603
 PMid:24666599 PMCid:PMC4023569
 |  
					|  |  
					| 5. Wagner, K., Barth, K., Palme, R., Futschik, A. and 
					Waiblinger, S. (2012) Integration into the dairy cow herd: 
					Long-term effects of mother contact during the first twelve 
					weeks of life. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 141: 117-129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2012.08.011
 |  
					|  |  
					| 6. Webb, L.E., van Reenen, C.G., Berends, H., Engel, B., de 
					Boer, I.J., Gerrits, W.J. and Bokkers, E.A. (2015) The role 
					of solid feed amount and composition and of milk replacer 
					supply in veal calf welfare. J. Dairy Sci., 98: 5467-5481. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2014-8547
 PMid:26004839
 |  
					|  |  
					| 7. Pempek, J.A., Eastridge, M.L., Botheras, N.A., Croney, 
					C.C. and Yoho, W.S.B. (2011) Effects of alternative housing 
					and feeding systems on the behavior and performance of dairy 
					heifer calves. Prof. Anim. Sci., 29: 278-287. http://dx.doi.org/10.15232/S1080-7446(15)30234-5
 |  
					|  |  
					| 8. Keil, N.M. and Langhans, W. (2001) Development of 
					intersucking among dairy calves around weaning. Appl. Anim. 
					Behav. Sci., 72: 295-230. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(00)00207-0
 |  
					|  |  
					| 9. Leruste, H., Brscic, M., Cozzi, G., Kemp, B., 
					Wolthuis-Fillerup, M., Lensink, B.J., Bokkers, E.A. and van 
					Reenen, C.G. (2014) Prevalence and potential influencing 
					factors of non-nutritive oral behaviors of veal calves on 
					commercial farms. J. Dairy Sci., 97: 7021-7030. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2014-7917
 PMid:25218744
 |  
					|  |  
					| 10. Roth, B.A., Barth, K., Gygax, L. and Hillmann, E. (2009) 
					Influence of artificial vs. mother-bonded rearing on sucking 
					behavior, health and weight gain in calves. Appl. Anim. 
					Behav. Sci., 119: 143-150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2009.03.004
 |  
					|  |  
					| 11. Roth, B.A., Hillmann, E., Stauffacher, M. and Keil, N.M. 
					(2008) Improved weaning reduces cross-sucking and may 
					improve weight gain in dairy calves. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 
					111: 251-261. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2007.06.007
 |  
					|  |  
					| 12. de Passillé, A.M. and Rushen, J. (2012) Adjusting the 
					weaning age of calves fed by automated feeders according to 
					individual intakes of solid feed. J. Dairy Sci., 95: 
					5292-5298. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-5521
 PMid:22916934
 |  
					|  |  
					| 13. Fröberg, S., Aspegren-Güldorff, A., Olsson, I., Marin, 
					B., Berg, C., Hernández, C., Galina, C.S., Lidfors, L. and 
					Svennersten-Sjaunja, K. (2007) Effect of restricted suckling 
					on milk yield, milk composition and udder health in cows and 
					behaviour and weight gain in calves, in dual-purpose cattle 
					in the tropics. Trop. Anim. Health Prod., 39: 71-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11250-006-4418-0
 PMid:17941489
 |  
					|  |  
					| 14. Appleby, M.C., Weary, D.M. and Chua, B. (2001) 
					Performance and feeding behaviour of calves on ad libitum 
					milk from artificial teats. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 74: 
					191-201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(01)00171-X
 |  
					|  |  
					| 15. de Passillé, A.M. (2001) Sucking motivation and related 
					problems in calves. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 72: 175-187. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(01)00108-3
 |  
					|  |  
					| 16. Keil, N.M., Audigé, L. and Langhans, W. (2000) Factors 
					associated with intersucking in Swiss dairy heifers. Prev. 
					Vet. Med., 45: 305-323. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-5877(00)00127-6
 |  
					|  |  
					| 17. Svensson, C. and Jensen, M.B. (2007) Short 
					communication: Identification of diseased calves by use of 
					data from automatic milk feeders. J. Dairy Sci., 90: 
					994-997. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(07)71584-9
 |  
					|  |  
					| 18. Gransworthy, P.C. (2005) In: Calf and Heifer Rearing - 
					Principles of rearing modern Dairy Heifer from Calve to 
					Calving. Modern Calves and Heifers: Challenges for Rearing 
					Systems. 1st ed. Ch. 1. Nottingham University Press, 
					Nottingham, England. p1-33. |  
					|  |  
					| 19. Mitlöhner, F.M., Morrow-Tesch, J.L., Wilson, S.C., 
					Dailey, J.W. and McGlone, J.J. (2001) Behavioral sampling 
					techniques for feedlot cattle. J. Anim. Sci., 79: 1189-1193. http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/2001.7951189x
 PMid:11374538
 |  
					|  |  
					| 20. Mahmoud, M.E. and Salman, D. (2015) Low body condition 
					scoring as a detrimental factor to reproductive performance 
					and behavior in dairy cattle and Seidi buffaloes. Assiut 
					Vet. Med. J., 61: 112-118. |  
					|  |  
					| 21. Food Safety Inspection Service, (FSIS). (2013) Using 
					Dentition to Age Cattle. U.S. Department of Agriculture. 
					Washington, DC. Available from: 
					http://www.fsis.usda.gov/ofo/tsc/bse_information.htm. 
					Accessed on 01-03-2013. |  
					|  |  
					| 22. Georg, H. and Ude, G. (2007) Reducing cross - Sucking of 
					group housed calves by an environmental enriched building 
					design. 9. Wissenschaftstagung Ökologischer Landbau. Beitrag 
					archiviert unter. Available from: http://www.orgprints. 
					org/view/projects/wissenschaftstagung-2007.html. Last 
					accessed on 14-06-2016. |  
					|  |  
					| 23. Jung, L. and Ledfors, L. (2001) The effect of mount of 
					milk, milk flaw and the access to a rubber teat on 
					cross-sucking and non-nutritive sucking in dairy calves. 
					Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 72: 201-213. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(01)00110-1
 |  
					|  |  
					| 24. de Paula Vieira, A., Guesdon, V., De Passillé, A.M. and 
					Von Keyserlingk, M.A.G. (2008) Behavioral indicators of 
					hunger in dairy calves. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 109: 
					180-189. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2007.03.006
 |  
					|  |  
					| 25. Nielsen, P.P., Jensen, M.B. and Ledfors, L. (2008) Milk 
					allowance and weaning method affect the use of computer 
					controlled milk feeder and development of cross-sucking in 
					calves. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 109: 223-237. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2007.01.015
 |  
					|  |  
					| 26. Meale, S.J., Leal, L.N., Martín-Tereso, J. and Steelea, 
					M.A. (2015) Delayed weaning of Holstein bull calves fed an 
					elevated plane of nutrition impacts feed intake, growth and 
					potential markers of gastrointestinal development. Anim. 
					Feed Sci. Technol., 209: 268-273. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2015.08.008
 |  
					|  |  
					| 27. Keil, N.M., Audigé, L. and Langhans, W. (2001) Is 
					intersucking in dairy cows the continuation of a habit 
					developed in early life? J. Dairy Sci., 84: 140-146. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(01)74462-1
 |  
					|  |  
					| 28. Jensen, M.B. (2006) Computer - Controlled milk feeding 
					of group housed calves: The effect of milk allowance and 
					weaning type. J. Dairy Sci., 89: 201-206. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(06)72084-7
 |  
					|  |  
					| 29. Rushen, J., de Passillé, A.N. and Von Keyserlingk, 
					M.A.G. (2008) The welfare of cattle. Introduction: What is 
					Animal Welfare? Springer, Dordrecht, Neitherland. p1-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6558-3
 |  
					|  |  
					| 30. Vaughan, A., Miguel-Pacheco, G.G., de Passillé, A.M. and 
					Rushen, J. (2016) Reciprocated cross sucking between dairy 
					calves after weaning off milk does not appear to negatively 
					affect udder health or production. J. Dairy Sci., 99: 
					5596-5603. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-9504
 PMid:27085413
 |  
					|  |  
					| 31. De Vliegher, S., Fox, L.K., Piepers, S., McDougall, S. 
					and Barkema, H.W. (2012) Invited review: Mastitis in dairy 
					heifers: Nature of the disease, potential impact, 
					prevention, and control. J. Dairy Sci., 95: 1025-1040. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-4074
 |  
					|  |  
					| 32. Piepers, S., Peeters, K., Opsomer, G., Barkema, H.W., 
					Frankena, K. and De Vliegher, S. (2011) Pathogen group 
					specific risk factors at herd, heifer and quarter levels for 
					intramammary infections in early lactating dairy heifers. 
					Prev. Vet. Med., 99: 91-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2011.02.010
 PMid:21411160
 |  
					|  |  
					| 33. Loberg, J. and Lidfors, L. (2001) Effect of stage of 
					lactation and breed on how dairy cows accept foster calves. 
					Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 74: 97-108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(01)00157-5
 |  
					|  |  
					| 34. Greenland, S. and Finkle, W.D. (1995) A critical look at 
					methods for handling missing covariates in epidemiologic 
					regression analyses. Am. J. Epidemiol., 142: 1255-1264. PMid:7503045
 |  
					|  |  
					| 35. Dechow, C.D., Rogers, G.W. and Clay, J.S. (2002) 
					Heritability and correlations among body condition score 
					loss, body condition score, production and reproductive 
					performance. J. Dairy Sci., 85: 3062-3070. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74393-2
 |  
					|  |  
					| 36. Kadarmideen, H.N. and Wegmann, S. (2003) Genetic 
					parameters for body condition score and its relationship 
					with type and production traits in Swiss Holsteins. J. Dairy 
					Sci., 86: 3685-3693. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73974-5
 |  
					|  |  
					| 37. Gautam, G. and Nakao, T. (2009) Prevalence of urovagina 
					and its effects on reproductive performance in Holstein 
					cows. Theriogenology, 71: 1451-1461. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.12.027
 PMid:19286246
 |  |